Talk:David J. Schmidly

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

BLP edit

Please not vis-a-vis the recent edit warring over a "controversy" section that I have blanked the section as a courtesy for now (without offering an opinion as to the validity of any of the information). The matter is currently under discussion at WP:BLP/N. Wikidemon (talk) 18:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Controversies section edit

In the interest of full disclosure, I was the first to add any mention of controversy concerning Schmidly. My addition of this paragraph was in no way intended to bias the article, but rather to provide relevant and current information concerning the topic. In retrospect, however, adding this paragraph was inappropriate given my proximity to the subject and my strong personal opinion on the controversy surrounding him. For these reasons, I believe it important that I recuse myself from editing or providing my opinion on this article.

That said, allow me to quickly contradict my previous statement and say simply that something has to be done about this Controversies section. What began as a brief note about an on-going controversy surrounding Mr. Schmidly has since evolved into something of a tabloid article. It is well-sourced, but nonetheless reads as either a low-quality attempt at journalism or indeed an attempt to bias the article, if only due to its length relative to the rest of the article. I would suggest trimming down this section to provide only a brief mention of the circumstances surrounding his separation from OSU, the recent no-confidence vote by the UNM faculty, and the history behind this no-confidence vote (namely, accusations of cronyism). AmiDaniel (talk) 09:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I trimmed the section significantly. It is still half the article so should either be trimmed further or more should be added to other sections or both. →Wordbuilder (talk) 14:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Much better. Thank you. AmiDaniel (talk) 20:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David J. Schmidly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David J. Schmidly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply