Talk:David Furnish

Male

Added male to Elton John. We must not assume our readers know who he is and it sounded like he was a she, SqueakBox 23:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

who's put christopher biggins? quality.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

"Jack" Furnish

Was "Jack" his father's legal name or was is a nickname for "John"? Graymornings (talk) 07:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Husband?

I don't think calling Furnish the "husband" of Elton John is quite right. Obviously the pair have a relationship equal to that of husband and wife, but two issues come to my mind. First, the stereotyping of words like husband and wife that used to be mimicked in gay culture where one partner felt compelled to assume the gender role of a female housewife, and the other partner assuming the opposite role- using the word "husband" might imply that. The other and main reason is that --though I am no expert, I still believe that the current laws under which Furnish and Elton John have their partnership do not yet reach all the full benefits given to a man and woman in wedlock. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I guess it doesn't matter now, they're legally married. Not sure why they waited for the UK to change its laws first, as same-sex marriage has been available in Toronto for more than a decade, but what's done is done. K7L (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

He's a husband, they are both husbands. there is no slight in this terminology. Flagpolewiki (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Sons

How can two sons be "born to the couple? The child is either not biologically descended from one, or is not biologically descended from either. There cannot physically be two fathers.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Title

Is there any work on if David Furnish has a title via his husband's knightship? I'm pretty sure that wives of knights get to be called "Lady", do husbands of knights have any title attached?--Canuckguy (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

He has no title by virtue of elton's knighthood. one day he may, but not yet. Flagpolewiki (talk) 14:59, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Probably not in the way that the husbands of Dames don't. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

PJS

There have been two rather sensationalist attempts to introduce content about the privacy injunction into the article. I'd suggest the following at the end of the body (not the lead) as a neutral way of covering it. There are a lot of incorrect sources out there; many incorrectly identify the claimant in the case. It might be best to wait until the injunction is lifted and see if more consistency emerges among highly reliable sources.

In 2016, Furnish was the claimant in PJS v News Group Newspapers, in which he obtained a privacy injunction preventing publication within England and Wales of the details of sexual encounters between him and two men, Daniel Laurence and Pieter van Den Berg. Media outside England and Wales subsequently identified the individuals involved.

References

--Trystan (talk) 13:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The National Post is probably the best source covering this so far. Even if it is true (which people in England and Wales are not supposed to know), it falls under the usual rules of BLP, due weight and recentism. Frankly, none of this would have risen above the supermarket tabloid level without attempts to keep it out of the media. There will be more reliable coverage in the UK if, as seems likely, the injunction is lifted in the next few days.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 13:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

---The Toronto Star runs a similar story and is a reliable, broadsheet newspaper. http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/2016/04/11/david-furnish-named-in-sex-scandal-uk-court-bans-coverage.html Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I have added information about the non-uk media coverage for encyclopedic purposes. This is on no way intended to suggest the identity of "PJS". Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I have added a Straits Times (broadsheet) source to the article. [1] cagliost (talk) 10:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Furnish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150107145128/http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/style/articles/2015-01/05/best-dressed-men-2015 to http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/style/articles/2015-01/05/best-dressed-men-2015/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

John

"Furnish is co-chief of Rocket Pictures along with John." Does this mean Elton John or his brother John? It's unclear. 75.170.95.127 (talk) 22:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Furnish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120013211/http://www.eltonjohn.com/news/news_details.aspx?postid=19034cc6-3ced-433a-ba29-c83eeb8c3cf4 to http://www.eltonjohn.com/news/news_details.aspx?postid=19034cc6-3ced-433a-ba29-c83eeb8c3cf4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120013211/http://www.eltonjohn.com/news/news_details.aspx?postid=19034cc6-3ced-433a-ba29-c83eeb8c3cf4 to http://www.eltonjohn.com/news/news_details.aspx?postid=19034cc6-3ced-433a-ba29-c83eeb8c3cf4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)