Talk:David Choi
| |||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New article edit
The new article is not at all identical to the previously deleted version. I hold that David Choi is now notable, and demonstrated by the coverage in reliable sources. --Apoc2400 (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep Choi. He IS famous for goodness sake, and if Wong Fu is, he SHOULD be. He has so many songs that fans bought from iTunes. So he IS important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illuendo (talk • contribs) 12:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Note edit
ADMIN This page is used to promote the artist music wiki pedia is more about famous people david choi is not famous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.158.174.199 (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- I disagree. See the article. Airplaneman talk 02:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Sample edit
If possible, maybe someone could include a sample of his song? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annnaaaleee (talk • contribs) 02:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Choi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625234813/http://www.jcpenney.net/shared/content/PDFs/ADDY.pdf to http://www.jcpenney.net/shared/content/PDFs/ADDY.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)