Talk:Déjà Vu (Bob Taylor and Inna song)

Untitled

There is a musicvideo where inna appears - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9gEzRUt_EA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.60.217 (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a musical recording that does not indicate its own importance and where the artist's article does not exist, because the song was released as a single, actually charted in several European countries (including #6 in France). One of the artists is notable enough (per WP standards) to have her own article as well as a separate discography. Possibly there was coverage in the press, although I don't see any at the moment (and don't speak Romantian...). In any case, this doesn't deserve a speedy deletion, even if somebody wants to PROD it later. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Déjà Vu (Inna song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "The music video for "Déjà Vu" was shot by Tom Boxer in a club in Neptun, Romania (pictured)" - no need for the "pictured"

   "it reached number 60 on the British Singles Chart" - it's known as the UK Singles Chart, but feel free to ignore

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I see no reason to put this on hold, so I'll pass it now. Congratulations! JAGUAR  20:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Déjà Vu (Inna song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140126015353/http://www.ultratop.be/nl/annual.asp?year=2010 to http://www.ultratop.be/nl/annual.asp?year=2010
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140209194431/http://www.ultratop.be/fr/annual.asp?year=2010 to http://www.ultratop.be/fr/annual.asp?year=2010

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)