Talk:Cumberbatch
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Kennethaw88 in topic Requested move 18 November 2016
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 18 November 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) kennethaw88 • talk 06:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Cumberbatch → Cumberbatch (name) – Cumberbatch should be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Benedict Cumberbatch. He qualifies WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in my view. Google Books renders about 26,800 results for "Cumberbatch", whereas "Cumberbatch" -"Benedict" renders around 4,500 less. Probably about as primary as Nixon is to Richard Nixon. --Nevé–selbert 01:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as ridiculous primarytopic overreach. Dicklyon (talk) 05:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Care to espouse as to why, Dicklyon? Perhaps an argument can be made per WP:RECENTISM, although most of the other Cumberbatches aren't really that notable and are rather obscure, as far as I can tell (having looked at their articles). Cumberbatch is a rather peculiar name, and a quick Google search for "Cumberbatch" -"Benedict" renders only about 455,000 results (compared to just plain "Cumberbatch" rendering over 23 million). The statistics tell me that most searching for "Cumberbatch" are most probably looking for the actor. (Note I have changed the move request to Cumberbatch (name), since this is probably more appropriate for a page like this.)--Nevé–selbert 08:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- I've been considering this move request for around a while now, since a lot of the people I know have watched and talked about his new film, and one day I forgot his first name and typed in "Cumberbatch" and landed here. I'm not entirely sure Cumberbatch should redirect to his article, but I feel that such a discussion is probably worth it. After all, there was a whole debate at Talk:Snowden as to whether Snowden should be a redirect to Edward Snowden.--Nevé–selbert 08:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose verbatim as @Dicklyon:. No one refers to the actor as "Cumberbatch". Mononyms are very rarely used for anyone except presidents and dead composers and painters. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. Smacks of WP:RECENTISM. bd2412 T 20:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not generally referred to just by his surname. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.