Talk:Creole cream cheese

Needs rewrite from independent sources

This article is poor to the point it qualifies for deletion. It needs a complete rewrite from reliable and independent sources. --Ronz (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Article can certainly be improved (eg, info on the history of Creole cream cheese is currently lacking). The subject is a notable bit of local culinary culture - you can list it for proposed deletin if you wish, but I would oppose. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

So how do we treat local culinary culture properly for an encyclopedia article? Not with press releases and local interest stories. --Ronz (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You use the best sources you can, but you don't remove content that isn't realistically disputed. I appreciate that the editing now appears to be moving forward in a productive manner. I agree with Candleabracadabra that when Blue Bell (a notable company with considerable mystique in that part of the country) revives its commercial distribution of this "endangered" flavor, it's worth including in the article; the source is used only to verify an objective fact and is reliable for that purpose. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

So their press releases are noteworthy because they are?! No. It's notable when independent sources say so.

We have a ton of trivial detail based upon highly questionable sources. The information simply doesn't belong without better sources.

It's clear that content is being added without regard to related content, what would be considered encyclopedic, or the quality of sources. As a result, we have mostly a prose list of companies and events that highlight the product.

"you don't remove content that isn't realistically disputed" You mean like all the information that I restored that was removed as "disruptive" [1]? If so, I agree. Otherwise, the statement is meaningless as far as I can tell. I removed information that was in my opinion trivia and undue. There's lots more to be removed if independent sources are not forthcoming. --Ronz (talk) 00:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I've expanded all the references for easy examination and proper identification. Since we now have at least a few good sources is it time to rewrite from them, removing all the trivia? --Ronz (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I've started with a 2012 summer restaurant guide being used as a reference. --Ronz (talk) 03:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Creole cream cheese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120501122256/http://appetiteforlife.msn.com:80/articles/detail/milklady-cheesecake?wt.mc_id=msnhp to http://appetiteforlife.msn.com/articles/detail/milklady-cheesecake?wt.mc_id=msnhp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)