Talk:Church of Analco, Puebla
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Church of Analco, Puebla article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Templo de Analco (Puebla) from es.wikipedia. |
Title edit
Templo de Analco may be a better title for this article (I'm not sure), but I've redirected the page to Templo del Santo Ángel Custodio de Analco (the name displayed on the plaque outside the church) for now. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @BrugesFR: Curious if you have any thoughts? ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:07, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: The churches in the english wikipedia are titled by churches, so I consider in my opinion that it should be called Church of Santo Ángel Custodio de Analco, and we place in the article its corresponding Spanish name. The original names of places in mexico were changed after the colony. In my opinion they should be called churches, temple can be any place of prayer for anyone who has passed through the Earth or any religion. In addition, to avoid confusion with pre columbian temples is should to call the churches in my opinion. What do you think?--BrugesFR (talk) 22:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- BrugesFR, I don't know, honestly, which is why I'm fine with whatever other editors think is best. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Expansion edit
@Nancystodd: Thanks for expanding this article! I hope you'll consider promoting to Good article status. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thanks for your edits! I was wondering about the gallery myself, but I wasn't sure how best to resolve it. It does look better the way you set it up. I am working on another section that I haven't finished yet and should be posting sometime this weekend. Translating doesn't take long, but finding appropriate references to support what is included takes a bit longer! The original article in Spanish does not have valid references for all the content in it. In any case, when I am done with that, I'll add this article to the list for reassessment. ---Nancystodd (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Nancystodd, Wonderful! Looking forward. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure if these are applicable:
- https://books.google.com/books?id=kZFZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA155&lpg=PA155&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false
- https://books.google.com/books?id=36unjdb9hnwC&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false
- book search
---Another Believer (Talk) 01:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
@Nancystodd: A few edits were made ahead of the copy edit I've request from the Guid of Copy Editors. I mean no offense, I request these all the time, especially for articles I think have potential to be promoted to Good article status. I invite you to please review these changes. Thanks again for your work here! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Template edit
@Jonesey95: Thanks for your recent edit. Do you know if this is being used correctly in the infobox? ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Based on the infobox's code output at Special:ExpandTemplates, it looks fine to me, but I can never remember the nuances of MOS when it comes to italicizing proper names or not. Depending on where you look in MOS, the guidance is difference. I would leave it as is unless someone complains. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Jonesey95, Thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)