Talk:Chinatown, Phoenix

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Hook mods

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by MB (talk). Self-nominated at 04:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   The article checks the boxes of length, neutrality, expansion, image copyright, and the hook has adequate citation in the form of a book. With QPQ done, I see no issue here:  Y Trillfendi (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hook mods edit

Theleekycauldron, I don't like the change to "Chinatown, Phoenix". That is completely unnatural and is WP's way of disambiguating since there are many Chinatowns. No one ever called it Chinatown, Phoenix. Can we put this back to Phoenix's Chinatown? The change to the end of the hook is an improvement - eliminating an "in". MB 01:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@MB: I agree, it's a little awkward; I was trying to fix the MOS:GEOCOMMA problem with "Phoenix, Arizona's". Is there no issue there/can you help me out on that? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 01:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Theleekycauldron, I think it was correct. The apostrophe is "other punctuation". MB 01:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Theleekycauldron, I put that part of the hook back as it was. This wasn't intended to be quirky, but I saw we are low on quirky hooks. We could scrap this hook and go more quirky (but that would require reopening the nom and adding cites in the article) with: