Talk:Chicken as food

(Redirected from Talk:Chicken (food))
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Bendegúz Ács in topic Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2024


What

edit

This article is crap that picture is not right 73.162.28.9 (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a better picture? 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 01:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vitamin B12 in Chicken

edit

100 grams of chicken meat also contains 0.41 µg of Vitamin B12. Why is this not mentioned? Reputable sources are easy to find all over the internet. Yes, the chicken is a good source of Vitamin B12 and the article is not mentioning it. Please include it. Here is the source https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/331897/nutrients — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.64.136.84 (talk) 03:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

What can chicken do

edit

They have B12 in them ,it is a good example for B12 102.67.1.3 (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 5 February 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Clear consensus to stay with current title based largely on WP:CONSISTENT. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


Chicken as foodChicken in Culinary Practices – a more specific and engaging title could enhance the article's appeal and accessibility to readers 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC) Chicken as food → Chicken in Culinary Practices - The current title "Chicken as food" lacks specificity regarding its focus on human consumption. By including "Chicken in Culinary Practices" in the proposed title, we highlight the article's main focus on the role of chicken in human cuisine. This change aims to better inform readers about the content they can expect to find in the article, making it more accessible and appealing to those interested in culinary topics and everyone in general. Thanks. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose, as this name format is not used in any other similar articles listed in Category:meat or subcategories. Also I would like to note that even if consensus to move per nominator's reasoning is found, the new name should be Chicken in culinary practices per Wikipedia's capitalization policy. Bensci54 (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well if that's the case I can agree to change the new name to "Chicken in culinary practices". Additionally, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. We have dozens of "as food" articles: Fish as food, Snails as food, Eggs as food, ... and no "...in culinary practices" articles. Why should chicken be any different? --Macrakis (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Other articles may look different, that's the nature of Wikipedia. Fish as food could possibly be improved, but that's not particularly relevant to this discussion. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2024

edit

aproval = approval 2603:8000:D300:3650:6C65:54EA:701D:78D (talk) 07:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done, thanks for reporting! Bendegúz Ács (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply