Howdy! I'm willing to continue working on this article as it will become the authoritative source on this previously under-reported military program. Let's go item by item to get this rolling! First, and perhaps most importantly, I believe this subject to be notable. Can you please explain your reasoning against this, and let me know what I can do to ensure that it meets the notability guidelines?
@Dogsbrunch: I didn't think the article would necessarily be kept at a deletion discussion. The Dyson references aren't necessarily bad but he's the author of note on three of the four references, and it's not clear if he's the only person who has ever discussed the project at length. The fourth reference was only a couple sentences long and did not seem like significant coverage to me, though it can definitely be used as a reference in the article, just not to establish notability. Notability here works based on whether secondary sources have discussed the topic in a way that we don't have to do any original research, so the way to improve this would be to find additional independent, secondary references which discuss the topic at length - you probably only need one or two more. SportingFlyerT·C 17:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Excellent, thanks for your guidance. It's hard to find ANY references to this project, and certainly not in one place. I'll seek additional sources and re-submit. Thanks again! Dogsbrunch (talk) 00:43, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive:
A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades:
Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Invitation to Cornell study on Wikipedia discussionsedit
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various discussion pages.
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Latest comment: 29 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.