 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Chauncey H. Cooke. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.anb.org/articles/20/20-01902-print.html
- Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-206987563.html
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.anb.org/articles/20/20-01902-print.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Notability? edit
I'm not generally deletionist by any stretch, but I'm struggling to see what is notable about this person: several hundred thousand men fought in the Civil War, and surely tens of thousands of them went on to become teachers. What makes this one particularly notable? From the citations, it seems perhaps more appropriate that they should be used to support a "life and motivation" section in Infantry in the American Civil War? —Luis (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- The person's been mentioned in several different published books from reputable sources, so it fits the notability criterion. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk), 01:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- I really don't have time/energy to get into a notability battle, but it seems to me that the Military history project's notability guide is directly applicable. None of the nine criteria listed there apply to this person. Given that one of the multiple books is just a copy of his letters, and the others are general histories that cite to his letters specifically to show the experience of "ordinary" soldiers, "any person who ... is traceable only through primary documents is not notable" seems like the more applicable part of the guideline. —Luis (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)