Talk:Cathedral-Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar

[Untitled]

A picture of the pillar would be great. --euyyn 19:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

---

zaragoza, en inglés es: SARAGOSSA-------------------------------------------------

Major rewrite

To all editors. I am planning to do a major copy edit on this entry in the next few days: including expanding, sectioning and adding inline references. Please let me know if there are any concerns regarding that. Cheers Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 14:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The early "history" might better be reported as legend. --Wetman 12:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The early period

I agree with Wetman - The difference between legend and documented history needs to be much clearer in this text. I tried to edit it, and I quoted Wikipedia's page on the Early Christian Church https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Roman_Catholicism_in_Spain#Beginnings to back up my speculation that in reality it is unlikely there was much of a church at the site of the Pillar until the late Roman period, after the edict of Milan. I also quoted the official website of the Church of the Pillar as additional support http://www.basilicadelpilar.es/templo.htm . However my edit was erased (redacted) by Wikipedia (bgwhite) in August 2015, I think due to lack of documented evidence. I find this a little ironic as I was trying to separate the two - documented and legend (undocumented), and while my source for the early church only quote web sources to back it up, there is no other documentation mentioned in this text to support a church being there at any time before Alfonso the Batallador in 1118, when the Romanesque church was built, other than the legendary stories. That of course is part of the charm and story of this church, and should appear on the page, but it is clearly not part of the documented history of it. I think this line :{{Numerous churches have been built upon this site through the years. The tiny chapel built by Saint James later gave way to a basilicalike enclosure during Constantine I's time | This article (Wikipedia), under heading "Romanesque Church"}} especially misleading, as there is no evidence supplied to support this. Since my edit was removed I will leave this page alone, but can someone find out when the first real documented evidence of the existence of this church was, and include that? Kengele (talk) 11:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I have found a reference to the early church on-line quoting {{The Early Church: Origins to the Dawn of the Middle Ages|by E.G. Hinson | https://books.google.es/books?id=v0Ncja547i8C&pg=PT59&lpg=PT59&dq=early+church+in+spain&source=bl&ots=kUvRZ2iB6c&sig=D26VtO8YiLmVFtHEhNc647mjMm4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEoQ6AEwCGoVChMIuPLOrI-nxwIVjHAaCh0XHQCP#v=onepage&q=early%20church%20in%20spain&f=false}} where he states that Christianity was thriving in Spain by the time Constantine issued the edict of Milan in 313. Both Irenaeus (185) and Tertullian (ca 210) mentioned the existence of churches in Spain. By the mid-third century Cyprian's reply to a letter from Spanish bishops alluded to Christian communities in Leon, Astorga, Merida and Saragossa.Kengele (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Pilar2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pilar2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Pilar2.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cathedral-Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015051958/http://catholic-forum.com/saints/mary0030.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/mary0030.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)