This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
A fact from Carry Me Home (book) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Diane McWhorter wrote in Carry Me Home that a 1963 Bill Hudson photo of a black protester being attacked by a police dog drove "international opinion to the side of the civil rights revolution"?
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"McWhorter wrote that Hudson's photo that day drove "international opinion to the side of the civil rights revolution".[5]" This needs some qualification. As it stands, it suggests that until that moment, international opinion was neutral or on the side of the colour bar, and that the photo was the main factor in shifting opinion. Not so. There was a long, long history of criticism of the apartheid regimes of both South Africa and the USA in Europe, especially in Britain. This grandiose claim should not be allowed to stand without more on the context of objection to colour bars internationally. 81.129.135.11 (talk) 06:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
