Talk:Broad Recognition
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Randykitty in topic Relevance Added
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Broad Recognition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Relevance Added
editSince being flagged for potential deletion, this article has been updated to include two sections of the magazine's role in events of nationwide importance, its coverage of the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity scandal and its editors' participation in the TItle IX suit filed against Yale University. In light of these additions, the article should be considered as relevant. TehAnders (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Your updates would be more impressive if they actually had anything to do with the magazine itself. That some people who sued Yale also had some ties to the magazine does not make the magazine notable, for example (see WP:NOTINHERITED). Unless you can come up with something solid, this is headed for AFD, I fear. --Randykitty (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)