Talk:Brilliant Dadashova

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Vartuhi Vardanian

edit

Just curious, but is there a non-Azerbaijani source that confirms the information stated in this article on Vardanian? -- Clevelander 11:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

The link to her website in the "External links" section and in the image box is dead. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Age

edit

This person is registered with the Central Election Committee of Azerbaijan, which shows her age based on her Azerbaijani ID, which is 1959.[1] A non-partisan news website confirms this.[2] Parishan (talk) 11:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

According to her official website http://dadashova.com/, she was born in 1965 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Everest505 (talkcontribs) 15:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Her official website cannot top the state website or the third-party news website which cites official information from state agencies with regard to her date of birth. Parishan (talk) 09:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Salam Parishan.Mən pasport müğənni var. http://savepic.org/2665488.jpg Mən ilə məşğul sayı 055-784-70-49 və ya(+994557847049)zəng edəsiniz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.25.30.198 (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


Just a question, how can she have been born in 1965 when (according to the article) her mother died in a 1964 car accident? ~Adjwilley (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

RfC on birth date

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The birth date given on official voting rolls such as this one (translation) conflict with the artist's claims on her official page (translation). An editor who claims to be close to the artist has cited a purported image of the artist's passport to support that birth date. How should we proceed given the conflicting dates given by these sources?--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 18:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm inclined to believe the voting records. I can see how someone in the performing arts might have it in their interest to appear younger. PierceG (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
We are not here to judge. Give both dates, give their sources, and let people draw their own conclusion. DGG ( talk ) 20:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Why can't we judge? If there's a potential conflict of interest shouldn't that be taken into account? The "reliable" in "reliable sources" implies a judgment call. PierceG (talk) 23:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Agree with DGG. Celebrities often lie about their birth year in order to appear younger than they are, so two or three birth years are common. WP should just include them all, provided they are from reliable sources. Here, the passport image is useless, since its provenance is uncertain. The artist's own web page could be used, but perhaps worded as ".. she claims to be born in.." or similar per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. The voting roll looks pretty darn reliable and probably should have the most weight. --Noleander (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Include both sources with the voting records as the primarily weighted date. Dreambeaver(talk) 18:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Caution. Both sources appear to fall foul of WP:OR. I would be inclined to trust neither. Andrew327 16:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

How do you Know the voting record is for her? — raekyt 23:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brilliant Dadashova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply