Talk:Brian David Gilbert

Latest comment: 2 hours ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Source: [1] for Stranger Things; [2] for ABBA; [3] for health insurance
Moved to mainspace by Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

— Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧(talk | contribs) 16:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   The hook is really interesting, good to go! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The hooks is, in fact, interesting, good, and backed up by three reliable sources. You might consider posting to Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Halloween set (this has no impact at all on approval; I just don't know if you've seen the discussion there). I looked over the article for compliance with policies and noticed a couple of minor issue to resolve:
  • For "His popularity from Polygon enabled him to create his own content full-time."(24 September 2024) the source supports the order of events but only speculates on causality. If there's not a more direct source, I'd suggest moving this to the beginning of the paragraph and writing chronologically as a topic sentence, something like, "After developing a fanbase on Polygon, Gilbert began to create his own content full-time."
  • For "invoked leftist themes",(24 September 2024) is there a more clear verb to use here? (employed? included?)

@Vigilantcosmicpenguin: {{ping}} me and I'll mark this back as approved, Rjjiii (talk) 04:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply