Talk:Bogor Palace

Merge proposal

Agree with proposal, sensible to merge Istana Bogor, Bogor into Istana Bogor. Curiously enough, both articles were created on the same day by the same IP, and contain much the same text.--cjllw | TALK 21:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I've now gone ahead with the merge, since there was nothing unique in the former article, which now redirects to here.--cjllw | TALK 05:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

u might want to check out istana bogor - indonesian version (wiki indonesia), maybe you want to add some picture. just a thought 169.252.4.21 09:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Move proposal

Shouldn't this article be called "Bogor Palace" seeing as this is English Wikipedia? If nobody objects, I'll move it. After all, the Eiffel Tower article is not called "Tour Eiffel". Davidelit (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Yup - agree. But I don't agree with Around Indonesia --Merbabu (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bogor Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150219161048/http://bogorsehat.com/sejarah-bogor/106-kota-bogor-59284/265-sejarah-berdirinya-istana-bogor.html to http://bogorsehat.com/sejarah-bogor/106-kota-bogor-59284/265-sejarah-berdirinya-istana-bogor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Limited discussion after two relistings and no support expressed for move rationale. (non-admin closure) Shadow007 (talk) 02:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

---

The term "Istana" is usually left untranslated in academic publications in English. This also seems to be the case with other similar wikipedia articles:

• Istana Negara in Jakarta, Indonesia
• Istana Nurul Iman in Brunei
• Istana Bukit Serene in Malaysia
• The Astana in Sarawak, Malaysia

I would like to draw your attention to Schloss Esterházy and Schloss Allner, articles which use the German term 'schloss' instead of 'castle' or 'palace'.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Indoarchitect (talk • contribs) 12:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 20:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Here, as well (see Talk:Merdeka Palace), we don't have any real evidence one way or the other after two weeks. I note that among Indonesian palaces we also have Tampaksiring Palace and Cipanas Palace. There does not seem to be much consistency, but I do not see a strong reason to change the location of this particular article at the moment. Dekimasuよ! 06:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Indoarchitect seems to be inactive at the moment. I suggest closing this as no consensus for now and reopening it whenever new evidence can be presented. Dekimasuよ! 19:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.