Talk:Blog 27

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Please of source (link): "Poland singles chart trajectory". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.15.72.122 (talkcontribs) i. e. apparently from Polish Telekom ISP on 19:34, 25 June 2006

Ummm...not sure what that ^^^^^^ means... but I did some copy editing. Is it good enough to take of the copy editing banner yet? --Quaxmonster 08:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I tried fixing it up a little more, clearing up ambiguities and enclosing all song titles in speech marks, removing a few tautologies, that sort of stuff.

The survey about the band's international success needs to be cited.

--Lord Pheasant 07:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Info icon

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that contain a link to YouTube. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message on the talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. Because the source and legitimacy of videos on YouTube is almost impossible to determine, almost all of them are not reliable sources and are not verifiable. 2. Many videos on YouTube are of questionable copyright, which should not be linked from Wikipedia. If you are not sure whether the link on this article should be removed or if you would like to help spread this message, contact us on User talk:J.smith/YouTube Linklist. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

While I can agree in principle that linking to works of art is problematic, this is just a TV advertisement for a car; I think Fiat would hardly complain that more people can see it than were present during the broadcast, and it might count under fair use.
I. e. I'm rather against removal (although I couldn't care less about just this article :-) --Malyctenar 11:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unless fiat released the rights to the ad, wikipedia is put in an unfortunate place legally. ---J.S (t|c) 15:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I know I know, but I'm just saying that this could / should have gone only among the last of those thousands links. Oh well; two hype-made teens aren't worth the arguing. --Malyctenar 13:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The whole thing is still a mess but at least I took out the 'teenbeat box'--killing sparrows 05:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Uhlalala blog27.jpg

edit
 

Image:Uhlalala blog27.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Heyboy blog27.jpg

edit
 

Image:Heyboy blog27.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Lol blog27 album.jpg

edit
 

Image:Lol blog27 album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

New album

edit

The new album which is going to be released is NOT going to be Blog 27 album, but Tola Szlagowska's solo album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.186.126.247 (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

elderly care homes in bangalore elderly homes , senior citizens homes in bangalore senior citizens homes , old age homes in bangalore, Home For The Aged in bangalore ,home for mentally retarded ,home for disabled ,home for handicapped people ,home for men

edit

elderly care homes in bangalore elderly homes , senior citizens homes in bangalore senior citizens homes , old age homes in bangalore, Home For The Aged in bangalore ,home for mentally retarded ,home for disabled ,home for handicapped people ,home for mentally challenged ,vrudhaashram ,

We Provide Good Facility with Food Accommodation 24/7 Nursing care, medical, doctor,hygienic,Good Air , Garden ,Neat & Clean, old age home for movable person & bedridden,disabled people too ,

www.navachaithanya.com ,

kncashramas@gmail.com ,

Call : Mobile 9448244695 / 9242429994 , Land 080-65655555 ( Please Save & Pass this numbers to All. It may help some one )

Regardsgs Navachaithanya , www.navachaithanya.com , www.karunaamrutha.com , www.karunamrutha.com , www.kncarogyadham.com , www.oldagehome.net.in , www.navachythanya.com , www.navachatanya.com , www.navachytanya.com ,

www.navachaithanyahomenursing.com , www.navachaithanyaoldagehome.com ,

www.navachatanya.com , www.navachaitanya.com , www.kncarogyadhama.com ,

Please Save & forward this email to all. It may Help Some One — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.247.121 (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blog 27. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply