This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Valereee: You're welcome to flag the entry for deletion. I've added a few more sources and moved the page back into main space so I can add logo and continue making improvements. Thanks! ---Another Believer(Talk) 21:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer, please, please: which three sources support a claim to notability? Please, please, please don't make me create a source assessment table with 20+ entries. Please, please just tell me which three sources convinced you that this was notable? I trust that you are well-intentioned. I believe you are working with the best interests of the project. My concern is that your assessment of notability is compromised with your own local area, and you seem to believe more sources will fix the problem, when what we need is better sources. Which three sources and only three are the ones that are the best? Valereee (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer, why won't you just tell us which three convinced you this subject was notable? Why are you insisting upon refbombing instead of simply telling us which ones are the ones that support notability?Valereee (talk) 01:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Oh, good. Now we've got 30 sources for those trying to assess notability to go through. Happy happy joy joy. @Another Believer, instead of refbombing the article, why not just tell us which three sources are the ones that support notability? Valereee (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply