Talk:Battle of Zhovti Vody

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Picture edit

What's the point of having a picture one can't even properly see anyway? Is there a better version of it somewhere?radek 19:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The picture was lost between 1939-1945. If you can find better pictures or variants of this one, go ahead. This is better than nothing.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

B-class review edit

For WPPOAND: failed on the same grounds as milhist; insufficient inline citations, numerous unreferenced paragraphs. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Zhovti Vody. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply