The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
With the exception of the first sentence, most all the content in the article is incorrect. BASIS Independent Schools and BASIS International Schools are not managed by BASIS.ed.The controversy section is also accurate, but could appropriately be moved to the article describing BASIS Charter Schools (currently entitled BASIS Schools). This article seems like a good candidate for deletion. Thanks Alice Angstrom (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello Alice Angstrom, what is incorrect in this article, aside from the description of the company name and description of its structure? I understand that some of the references are unflattering. If there were more good press, that could go in -- aside from the fluff that is USN&WR rankings, which we've already discussed. I am not disinterested in this article as you can see from its history. John from Idegon would be a fair judge. Or you can take it to WP:AfD and see what others say. Make sure you mention in AfD that you are an employee of the subject. Rhadow (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}