Talk:Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden
|This article was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.|
|WikiProject Computing||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Video games||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:|
As "notable" as this phenomenon is, I am going to have to remove the joke elements and throw in some references from the media sources that covered it. I am not sure if the screenshots count as fair use, either. --DJH47 (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- That probably would not be a valid assumption. Fair use essentially requires each image to be informative to article rather than decorative. The DX10 image, which is clearly not (for laymen, Barkley's claim that it uses DirectX 10 is a joke), would have to be licensed to the Wikimedia foundation under the GFDL or placed into the public domain. "Non-commercial" simply fails to cover the scope. --DJH47 (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
i cant believe that that is actually a rule, then
like.. that image DOES show what the game is about. it's informative in that that is the kind of stuff that happens in-game. it isnt decorative, it's useful in that if you "get" that screenshot then you'll more than likely get the game as a whole.
Psyburn's version of the article is horrible and will just get this deleted. It's not amusing at all, it recycles all the marketing material of the game. Wikipedia is wikipedia, if you want the game here as much as anybody does you're going to have to think like a "wikipedia nazi" 220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Backley.PNGEdit
Image:Backley.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
- The following contrib was misplaced just above the sig line in the section preceding this new secn (technically creating a forgery.)
--Jerzy•t 05:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Article in EurogamerEdit
This game was covered in Eurogamer: http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=93941 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obonicus (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Is it a sign how bad the original game is that the article for the unofficial game is 10 times longer than the one for the original game?
Game Maker suryasEdit
That makes absolutely no sense. Probably just a test edit by a clueless user putting in their own (indian) name. I don't see it anywhere on Google besides copies of Wikipedia content 18.104.22.168 (talk) 09:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)