Talk:Samuel Beckett-class offshore patrol vessel

(Redirected from Talk:Babcock Marine OPV)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/news/newstrilogy-to-equip-irish-opvs-with-mercury-communications-systems/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


Replaced "problem" links with alternate (and associated copyedits). Guliolopez (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Displacement

edit

There seems to be some confusion on the displacement (tonnage) of the class. Previously this article reflected and cited various sources which gave the tonnage as ~1900 tonnes (as per Afloat magazine (Sep 2016), Examiner (May 2014), etc.) A recent change updated the displacement values to reflect other sources, which give a tonnage of ~2200 tonnes (as per the seemingly confused Afloat magazine (Sep 2014), ND Gazette (Jun 2015), Defence Services PRO (Jul 2015), etc.) While I'm personally inclined to consider some of the latter sources and the latter displacement value to be more reliable (and hence to leave the more recent change in place), does any editor have any thoughts on the reason for this incongruity? Or whether or how it might be reflected in the article? (300 tonnes is not an insignificant variance). Guliolopez (talk) 23:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Additions

edit

An anon editor seemingly wishes to make some content additions to this article. But is perhaps not a native English speaker. The anon editor might perhaps propose or raise the change they wish to make here (on the article talk page). So that other editors can assist. Asking other editors to "interpret" the intended addition or intent is unlikely to otherwise result in the best outcome. Guliolopez (talk) 16:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

In my latest edit, I have solved some grammar issues in my earlier edit, If there are other grammar issues remain, please point out, thanx ! 182.130.213.233 (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thanks for your note. Rather than perhaps asking others to correct or remove any content that is not correct, can you perhaps advise what content (not already covered in the article) that you are trying or hoping to add? What new information are you hoping to add to the article? And I'll be happy to help add it. Guliolopez (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Just like similar changes in my earlier edit, thanx ! 182.130.213.233 (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Firstly, move some content from first paragraph in article to sections Planning and construction and Names (for details, please see my earlier edit). Then add Paul Kehoe announced the fourth was named George Bernard Shaw on her keel laying ceremony in section Names (original references talked). That is all ! thanx ! 182.130.213.233 (talk) 03:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
If you don't do it, I will do ! 182.130.213.233 (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.130.237.123 (talk) Reply
If I don't do what? Add content (on the names) that would be redundant to the information in the table? And lead? And add content (on who announced the names) that would be overspecific for this context? And perhaps better suited to the article on the vessel itself? Guliolopez (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Samuel Beckett-class offshore patrol vessel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Samuel Beckett-class offshore patrol vessel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply