Talk:Bình Tân district, Vĩnh Long province

Latest comment: 7 years ago by BD2412 in topic Requested move 24 March 2017

Requested move 24 March 2017 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed for consistency. I note that relisting drew no further objection. bd2412 T 00:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

– The articles Vĩnh Long, Trà Vinh, Sóc Trăng etc. are currently occupied by cities not provinces. These districts, towns and communes are located in provinces, not cities. Per WP:CONSISTENCY to avoid confusion. Timmyshin (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • I don't really see how consistency covers this or how anyone could think these were cities. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • I'll support per WP:CONSISTENCY; we don't want readers to think these are city districts/suburbs, it would be doing them a disservice. For example, Bình Thủy District is about an urban district. Laurdecl talk 08:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Relisting comment: I feel uncomfortable going through with a mass move based on the limited conversation above. I'm relisting this again for a final time to see if we can get more discussion. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.