Talk:Axholme Joint Railway

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Bob1960evens in topic Assessment
Good articleAxholme Joint Railway has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 1, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Goods timetable

edit

I have removed the following, as there is no indication where it comes from, or when it applies to. It appears to be the only edit ever made by User:W.S.Becket, who has no user or talk page, so I am not hopeful that leaving a message for him will produce a result. If anyone thinks it should be part of the article, and has a reference for it, please add it back in.

Unable to accept locomotives with a greater route availability than 3, the line was worked by lightweight LMS 2MT 2-6-0 engines: four of the engines being used daily on the following goods workings:
1. 05.55 Goole – Fockerby/08.15 Fockerby – Reedness Jcn/08.50 Reedness Jcn – Peat Works/09.05 Peat Works – Goole/10.20 Goole – Reedness Jcn/11.20 Reedness Jcn – Goole/12.15 Goole -Reedness Jcn/12.40 Reedness Jcn – Goole.
2. 08.28 Goole – Hatfield/12.40 Hatfield – Goole
3. 10.20 Goole – Reedness Jcn/11.20 Reedness Jcn – Goole/12.15 Goole – Reedness Jcn/12.40 Reedness Jcn – Goole
4. 12.00 Goole – Reedness Jcn/12.45 Reedness Jcn – Fockerby/13.45 Fockerby – Reedness Jcn/17.30 Reedness Jcn – Goole

Bob1960evens (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

edit

I have assessed the article against the following criteria

  • Suitably referenced, with inline citations
  • Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
  • Defined structure, with adequate lead
  • Reasonably well written for grammer and flow
  • Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
  • Appropriately understandable

and am rating it B. Bob1960evens (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply