I have removed the following, as there is no indication where it comes from, or when it applies to. It appears to be the only edit ever made by User:W.S.Becket, who has no user or talk page, so I am not hopeful that leaving a message for him will produce a result. If anyone thinks it should be part of the article, and has a reference for it, please add it back in.
- Unable to accept locomotives with a greater route availability than 3, the line was worked by lightweight LMS 2MT 2-6-0 engines: four of the engines being used daily on the following goods workings:
- 1. 05.55 Goole – Fockerby/08.15 Fockerby – Reedness Jcn/08.50 Reedness Jcn – Peat Works/09.05 Peat Works – Goole/10.20 Goole – Reedness Jcn/11.20 Reedness Jcn – Goole/12.15 Goole -Reedness Jcn/12.40 Reedness Jcn – Goole.
- 2. 08.28 Goole – Hatfield/12.40 Hatfield – Goole
- 3. 10.20 Goole – Reedness Jcn/11.20 Reedness Jcn – Goole/12.15 Goole – Reedness Jcn/12.40 Reedness Jcn – Goole
- 4. 12.00 Goole – Reedness Jcn/12.45 Reedness Jcn – Fockerby/13.45 Fockerby – Reedness Jcn/17.30 Reedness Jcn – Goole
Bob1960evens (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have assessed the article against the following criteria
- Suitably referenced, with inline citations
- Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
- Defined structure, with adequate lead
- Reasonably well written for grammer and flow
- Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
- Appropriately understandable
and am rating it B. Bob1960evens (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply