Talk:Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System
 | Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suggestion edit
@Thegreatdr: have a look through both the JTWC ATCRs and the 2009 Review of hurricane forecasting article and see if there is anything decent in there that you could use to expand the article with. Theres also a nice image of the ATCF in the 2009 article that maybe able to be chucked on to commons.Jason Rees (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah might be a decent idea to make the Reason for development more of a history/bakground details section. There's a little bit on pg 169 of the 1986 ATCR which could help you out while theres a lot in 1987 ATCR.Jason Rees (talk)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 00:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
I'll take this.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
The wording looks good, enough detail, and the info is verifiable. Passing.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ofcm.gov/homepage/text/spc_proj/ihc/action-items.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Why are the previous versions mostly grayed/crossed out? edit
In looking into the copyvio issue, I ran into another one -- most of the edit history is gone. How can that happen, exactly? Thegreatdr (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nevermind. It was explained. One of the existing references was used to replace what was probably lost. Thegreatdr (talk) 03:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)