Talk:Atlanta Braves tomahawk chop and name controversy

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Atlanta Braves tomahawk chop and name controversy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Baseball: Braves Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Atlanta Braves.

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Atlanta task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate Atlanta related articles from Unassessed Atlanta articles and Category:Unknown-importance Atlanta articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Atlanta articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Infobox : Atlanta articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Atlanta
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Atlanta
Stubs : Work on stubs in Category:Atlanta stubs.
Other : * Help out with articles placed in Category:Atlanta articles needing attention
- Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get Atlanta into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Removal of Chop On Sign

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Changing a sign isn't a notable chapter in this controversy. For it to be notable the Braves or a credible source would have to state that the team made this change because of the controversy. The sign had moved at least once before it was finally removed completely. The citation in the article doesn't provide evidence that this is connected to the controversy. Further evidence needs to be presented to make this addition to this article.

Also, it should be noted that the Braves started using "For The A" for marketing weeks before the season started and before this sign was removed. Nemov (talk) 01:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why is this a Good Article?

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I did not read this article before the merge proposal, and now that I have wonder why it exists at all. The content does not go much beyond what is covered in the section Native_American_mascot_controversy#Atlanta_Braves, and does not appear to justify its own article. It certainly is not a GA, being a summary of how the Braves fit into the larger controversy, with references limited to newspaper articles. The main article cites academic journals and the statements of many Native American organizations, civil rights and professional organizations. There are journal articles that refer to the Braves, these being two examples:

Miller, Jackson B. (1999). "Indians, Braves, and Redskins: A Performative Struggle for Control of an Image". Quarterly Journal of Speech. 85 (2): 188–202. ISSN 0033-5630.
Rose, Christine (2002). "The Tears of Strangers Are Only Water: The Refusal of America to Understand the Mascot Issue.(braves or Cowards? Use of Native American Images and Symbols as Sports Nicknames)". Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal. 1 (2). ISSN 1556-9799.

--WriterArtistDC (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Nemov, you appear to have given this a GA rating when you created the talk page. I do not see it listed in the list of good articles, and I do not see a good article nomination anywhere. I'm therefore adjusting its rating; please ping me if there's something we're missing. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@SdkbSorry for the confusion. It's probably just a copy and paste error I made at the time. Thanks! - Nemov (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

No worries. I ran a query and found 85 such miscategorizations; I'll go through and clear them out shortly. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic