Talk:Anniemal

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anniemal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

It passed. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Untitled

Nice article! Rusty8 (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Intro Sample

"Intro" is sampled from "Gimme Your Money" (DJ Kicks: Annie) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.244.232 (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anniemal/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

To reach B-class status: Needs more prose, expanded intro. Could have a section on the album history (Tore's death following the underground success of Greatest Hit delayed Annie releasing an album, etc.). Critical reception section is important because of the internet buzz about the album vs. the poor chart performance. Need info about album sales. To reach Good Article status: Broader coverage of album history, recording process, contributions from other artists, critical reception/buzz (the album was considered among critics to be "pop music that it's OK to like", for example), Annie's small-venue tour to support the album, comparisons to other artists (Saint Etienne, etc.). - carolyn81 (user • talk) 18:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 18:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anniemal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090111084437/http://www.mic.no:80/mic.nsf/doc/art2005052611173941311512 to http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2005052611173941311512

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anniemal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100201123814/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/annie/anniemal.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/annie/anniemal.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201125507/http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2005020812582887550926 to http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2005020812582887550926
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201125511/http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2005061410322836531013 to http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2005061410322836531013
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2005052611173941311512

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anniemal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160517082427/http://sfist.com/2009/11/16/sfist_interviews_annie.php to http://sfist.com/2009/11/16/sfist_interviews_annie.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)