A fact from Anna Reynolds (singer) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
Thanks, Gerda. I'd be much more comfortable if that editor could produce the BC, rather than simply asserting its contents. I'm placing a "citation needed" tag until we can get more than just the say-so of some anonymous person. -- Jack of Oz[pleasantries]22:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm in no position to deny the truth of it, and I make no judgement about our friend's good faith. But it does offend our rules requiring citations for significant material, and a subject's birth date is certainly that. If it's true, there will be some documentation of it somewhere, even if by a reliable secondary source. Until we know who the editor is, he cannot be assumed to be reliable. -- Jack of Oz[pleasantries]23:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
He can be assumed (!) - not proven - to be reliable. The editor is not anonymous, you could go to their talk. They gave good information on her death. - There may never be a secondary source. - Just thought of no relevance from --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've just corrected the date from 4 February to 24 February. The only source that gave the earlier date was from The Guardian, written by Alan Blyth, who died in 2007, as the piece acknowledges at the bottom. That alone makes any of the content suspect. All other sources were published after 24 February, which is consistent with that being the correct date. -- Jack of Oz[pleasantries]00:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply