Talk:Ani Phyo

Latest comment: 3 years ago by PKT in topic Assessment comment

How is she notable? edit

I've stopped going through the article, removing promotional material, because I don't see any sources demonstrating she's notable. AfD? --Ronz (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are some hits on google news: [1] and google books [2]. I think if someone wanted to work a bit, they could make a decent stub article. Active Banana ( bananaphone 21:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
She has recipes published in a variety of venues, but can anyone find articles with substantial coverage on her? Looks like she's very good a promoting herself as an accessible "expert" on raw food and nutrition for the media. A stub would be fine while editors sift through everything written on her to find something that doesn't look like it's just a slightly-modified press release. --Ronz (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, looking again at the hits theres not much actual content there. I think this would count as N:AUTH - a professional review of a food book [3] and this of her computer writing [4]. Maybe stub it down to there and rebuild with sources? Active Banana ( bananaphone 21:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Article cleanup necessary edit

It doesn't read like a normal encyclopedic entry. The first part actually reads like the CIA factbook, it's just missing her driver's license and platelet count. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.126.206.55 (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ani Phyo/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This piece reads like something hot off the desk of a PR flack.

I mean, please... "this show was attended by a global audience via the internet, and has changed our marketing landscape."

It's "changed our marketing landscape"?

Somehow, that just does not strike me as appropriate tone for an encyclopedia.

Gag me with an (organic!) spoon.

209.124.55.236 (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 14:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that today, and removed the statement. PKT(alk) 17:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply