This article was nominated for deletion on 1 October 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ana Maria Archila article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Some sourced material added from article Jeff Flake, to replace unsourced content added by another user to this article, with edit [1]. Sagecandor (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
As I said in my edit summary, refs (and improvements) were to follow. Gandydancer (talk) 17:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Gandydancer:That's no problem. I just didn't want to leave a huge bit of unsourced info on the page of a WP:BLP. Sagecandor (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
For five minutes? I could see if there was anything in the least bit controversial but there was not. I also would have no problem with you explaining that you had spent considerable time on your edit, which you obviously did, and hoped that I would not mind if you replaced my copy. But I do not agree with you that it needed to be tagged and then removed with a reminder of WP:BLP problems as though I would not know our guidelines. Gandydancer (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Gandydancer:Okay, no problem. I hear you. Please, feel free to add more sourced content and more sources as you wish. Sagecandor (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page should not be speedily deleted because it is well sourced and other editors have contributed. If it is to be deleted, it should go through AfD. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page should not be speedily deleted because it's informative as to who the person is, and is relevant to a high profile court case in the US and an active political group in US politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:268:C0C3:A518:DCD9:1643:DA1F:2 (talk) 02:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
