Talk:Alia Janine

AfD?

This page was nominated for deletion almost two years ago. Why was it never deleted? The subject of the page has provided dubious references and edits the article herself. She is not of note in any field. 172.250.73.100 (talk) 05:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Belated. Seems since the principal reason was a lack of sourcing, and currently there seems to be a tiny little bit of a {{reflist}}-- the decision must have been overridden. WurmWoode^T 07:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Alia Janine

Cyberbot II has detected links on Alia Janine which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/02/alia-janine-my-body-my-choice/

  Triggered by \blukeisback\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Alia Janine

Cyberbot II has detected links on Alia Janine which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/02/alia-janine-my-body-my-choice/

  Triggered by \blukeisback\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Single-purpose account vios

The editor User:RazzSazz is a single-purpose account with extremely few edits and evidently a conflict-of-interest account, who is edit-warring to remove valid, pertinent ELs because "This person is no longer performing in porn and does not need to promote hardcore porn websites when there are multiple mainstream SFW websites." I noted that Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED and that the edit is like saying once an actor retires we remove IMDb from the ELs. I've asked the editor, per WP:BRD, not to edit war and instead to discuss the issue on this talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

I would add that on top of edit-warring this SPA is deliberately adding false citations. The cites at his or her edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alia_Janine&diff=prev&oldid=777885166 don't mention a single word about Columbia or honor societies. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

This SPA is continuing to edit-war and make false claims unsupported whatsoever by their citations. The edit here is the same as the one immediately above and contain not one word about the education claims. There's also a false citation for your claim of "11 schools", as well as blatant edit-warring to insert IMDb refs despite WP:RS/IMDB — with a snarky, uncivil edit-summary here.

Despite my asking the editor to discuss their issues on this page, the editor refuses to do so. It's time to report them for disruptive editing and using false citations. --Tenebrae (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)