Talk:Aleksa Marković (Canadian soccer)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Elli in topic Requested move 23 April 2022

Requested move 23 April 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 17:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


– Same spellings. Currently only a discritic on the C different. However, I noticed the German wikipedia and soccerway spell the Austrian player with the diacritic. Alternatives are Aleksa Marković (soccer, born 1997) and Aleksa Marković (footballer, born 2001) RedPatch (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. RedPatch (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support disambiguating 2st since the Canadian one gets more views (50) than the Austrian one (11)[[1]] and most English readers won't type diacritics. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS, both names are extremely close to one another which might make people go to the wrong page should one or both becomes more notable. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 10:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support moving to year of birth, standard disambiguation given nationality is fluid. GiantSnowman 16:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom, and there should be a DAB at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom, and there should be a DAB at base name. Interesting that we allow ć for Canadians and Austrians to express their ć origins, but there's one living Serbian sportswoman who is forever denied her real name ć on English wikipedia. Can any of those participating in this RM explain that? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.