This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago19 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose the proposed move, but agree that Albert Chen Hung-yee is the best article title yet suggested. The others should both be redirects. Andrewa (talk) 07:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment can we codify the format (EnglishName FamilyName ChineseGivenName) into a guideline, say MOS:HK ? We keep running into WP:ENGVAR issues with people saying that Hong Kong English usage doesn't count, and moving articles away from it. 76.66.192.55 (talk) 22:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment I'm not sure English variations have much to do with this one. The source included in the article, from Hong Kong, uses the format Professor Albert Chen Hung-yee. Is there any evidence to suggest he is known differently in Hong Kong English? Skinsmoke (talk) 01:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment that is Hong Kong English. "Albert Chen" is other English, "Chen Hung-yee" is Cantonese. "Albert Hung-yee Chen" or "Hung-yee Albert Chen" is the format used in Anti-Hong Kong English proposals that people seem to voice in various other WP:RM discussions dealing with Hong Kong people. 76.66.192.55 (talk) 02:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment Perhaps Tvtr would like to explain his comment. There is no evidence that Albert Chen is the name commonly used for this individual in English, let alone in Hong Kong English. On the contrary, the only evidence we have so far is that he is referred to as Albert Chen Hung-yee. In addition, I can see nothing in WP:MOS that relates to this discussion whatever. Can he/she point to a relevant section? Skinsmoke (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Agree Both WP:UCN and WP:MOS appear to me to support this proposal, despite Tvtr's citing them as reasons for opposing it. Fortunately the closing admin will look at the arguments, not just count the votes. No change of vote. Andrewa (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment Take a look at WP:NC-ZH, namely under the General principle section. I know it's only a guideline, so I cited WP:UCN because it's a policy. This proposal is not supported by the WP:UCN, I don't know where you guys see in the policies that says it support a longer name such as Albert Chen Hung-yee, the shorter name Albert Chen is definitely the preferred choice suggested by WP:UCN, especially when he's currently the only notable person with the name Albert Chen supported by WP:N on Wikipedia. Tvtr (tlk–cntrbtn) 18:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment I don't see that Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) is much help here. If there was no example of the name being used in English, and we had to transliterate from Mandarin or Cantonese, then it might have some relevance. However, in this case, we have a citation which shows the use in English. Wikipedia:Article titles (which WP:UCN redirects to) does indeed tell us to use the common name in English. It does not tell us to invent one.Tvtr has so far failed to come up with a single example of this person being referred to as Albert Chen. Until he does so, we must assume that the common name is most definitely not Albert Chen, as the evidence so far points to Albert Chen Hung-yee. Skinsmoke (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment Once again, your argument is not supported by the WP:UCN. This article can be named in several forms Albert H. Y. Chen, Albert Chen Hung-yee, or Albert Chen. Per the WP:UCN, one of the criteria to determine the ideal title is to be Consistent – When other criteria do not indicate an obvious choice, consider giving similar articles similar titles. Take a look at Category:Hong Kong people, why is this article going to be unique from all those article names in the same category? The name you suggested was only mentioned once in one of the source, the person was referred as Albert H Y Chen in other part of the source. I also found a source where he was translated to only Albert Chen. Per the WP:UCN, names of people should use the common form: Albert Chen (Not "Albert Chen Hung-yee") Tvtr (tlk–cntrbtn) 20:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment If tlk has found a source that uses Albert Chen, it might help if he shared it with the rest of us (he hasn't previously mentioned this source). It might save an awful lot of arguing. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment Ah! I see tlk has now added the source to the article. Presuming that this is the same person (I notice that the name in Chinese characters is the same), and as this is the name under which he has published the article, this may well change everything. We now have two sources, one using Albert Chen Hung-yee and one using Albert Chen. Either of those would be an improvement on Albert H. Y. Chen. Now that an example has been found, the quote about consistency is one of the things we can take into account in choosing which name to select. Moreover, a quick Google search in English, confining the sources to Hong Kong, gives 675 results for Albert Chen excluding Hung-yee and just 86 for Albert Chen Hung-yee. While some of those for Albert Chen may refer to other people with that name, most appear not to. I think a case is now starting to build that Albert Chen is indeed the common use in Hong Kong English. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why does this article use Pinyin? Hong Kong is a Cantonese speaking region which uses Jyutping and Hong Kong romanizations, not pinyin, which is a Mandarin romanization. 76.66.192.55 (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply