This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Akmal Shaikh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Akmal Shaikh has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on December 29, 2009. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
execution
editAkmal Shaikh was killed by firing squad, not lethal injection. I didn't want to just edit that, I would rather mention it to whoever added it. thanks! Check with Clive Stafford-Smith, he was there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dazeylin (talk • contribs) 21:00, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Sources are contradictory on this. -- Ohc ¡digame! 22:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Akmal Shaikh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102061125/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2009-12-29/china-executes-briton-over-heroin-ignores-mental-health-claim.html to http://www.businessweek.com/news/2009-12-29/china-executes-briton-over-heroin-ignores-mental-health-claim.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100104114859/http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/5675231/dealing-with-china-in-2010.thtml to http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/5675231/dealing-with-china-in-2010.thtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928014203/http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/tag/akmail-shaikh/ to http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/tag/akmail-shaikh/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1239051/LEO-McKINSTRY-Sorry-join-liberal-wailing-heroin-traffickers-deserve-die.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091227064534/http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/editorial/2009-12/494027.html to http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/editorial/2009-12/494027.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102040014/http://www.reprieve.org.uk/songforpeace to http://www.reprieve.org.uk/songforpeace
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Akmal Shaikh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613013604/http://www.camdennewjournal.co.uk/2004%20archive/260804/n260804_5.htm to http://www.camdennewjournal.co.uk/2004%20archive/260804/n260804_5.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531202240/http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Around_the_World/2009-12-29/19245/Executed_Brit_was-MI5_terror_suspect to http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Around_the_World/2009-12-29/19245/Executed_Brit_was-MI5_terror_suspect
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100104053244/http://www.reprieve.org.uk/akmalshaikh to http://www.reprieve.org.uk/akmalshaikh
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100116160113/http://bjyouth.ynet.com/article.jsp?oid=62034978 to http://bjyouth.ynet.com/article.jsp?oid=62034978
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609120807/http://www.vermontlaw.edu/x7765.xml to http://www.vermontlaw.edu/x7765.xml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Poorly referenced
editThis entire article strikes me as having been written by the Chinese government. It states numerous “facts” without bothering to source them, and appears desperate to justify the execution of this man. Cbreitel (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Because he was guilty! 5.12.113.0 (talk) 11:51, 16 January 2019 (UTC)