Talk:Agatha (wife of Samuel of Bulgaria)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Bradv in topic Requested move 6 December 2016

Contradiction to Kosara of Bulgaria edit

Were these two actually a same person? It appears that both had born the same children: Theodora Kosara, Miroslava and Gavril Radomir. All the best, --Biblbroks's talk 01:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the articles Agatha, wife of Samuel and Kosara of Bulgaria refer to a same person! I don't know where the name Kosara is taken from, but the name of this women traditionally is given as Agatha in the history sources - see Vindobonensis historia.74! --Nauka (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Γαβριήλ ὁ και Ῥωμανὸς...., τεχθεὶς τῷ Σαμουηλ ἐξ Άγάθης τῆς θυγατρὸς Ὶωάννου τοῦ Χρυσηλιου τοῦ εν Δυρραχιῳ πρωτεὺοντος [Gavril, who was called also Roman,.. he was son of Samuil by Agatha, the daughter of John Chrisilius, governor of Dyrrhachion] - John Skylitzes. Vindobonensis historia.74. 13-14 c. --Nauka (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
In contemporary Bulgaria, the name Agatha is popular as the name of the writer Agatha Christie. K. Ali 17:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karim Ali (talkcontribs)

Page name edit

Since we know she was daughter of John Chryselios is there a reason this page name uses her husband to differentiate her and not her family name? 50.37.124.206 (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article makes clear that her being a daughter of Chryselios is not 100% certain, and at any rate, the family name is nowhere attested in connection with her. The only secure family link is her husband. Constantine 21:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 December 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. (non-admin closure) Bradv 22:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


Agatha, wife of Samuel of BulgariaAgatha (wife of Samuel of Bulgaria) – Not a royal title; must be parenthesized. Or maybe use Agatha, Empress of Bulgaria instead. George Ho (talk) 19:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nomination. Subject's entry in Bulgarian Wikipedia is simply titled "Agata", without any royal title, an example also followed by the Spanish, Portuguese and Macedonian Wikipedias. It may be also noted that a similarly-titled unrelated entry uses [as of this writing] the un-parenthisized main header, Agatha, wife of Edward the Exile. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 01:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - As per nomination. - Boneyard90 (talk) 10:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support move to parenthesized form. Her title as empress is uncertain, since she probably died before Samuel formally assumed the title of Tsar, and her notability is not such that a move to simple "Agatha" would be justified. Constantine 14:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose, a comma does not mean it is a royal title. This comma is a descriptive natural disambiguation, which is preferred over parenthetical disambiguation. The growing affection for unnatural parentheses is silly. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.