This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In this edit another contributor removed useful with the edit summary: "clarify and unlink interpretation of questionable source - original research".
This contributor has removed similar wikilinks from many dozens -- possibly one hundred other articles.
I have informed this other contributor that wikilinking is not original research. As near as I can determine, they have stopped this kind of removal of valid wikilinks.
But they have made no attempt to restore the wikilinks they removed from this or any other article they removed them from. Geo Swan (talk) 03:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Geo Swan we are discussing that topic at the moment as you know. I think it would like more sense if you would active engage in discussions to solve outstanding disputes instead of starting an edit war. You can not simply refuse to answer questions about content issues and not engage in the relevant discussions. Please do answer the outstanding questions and discussions. IQinn (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
