Talk:6/Archive 1

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2603:6081:2940:71:CC07:252C:B5D5:EAE0 in topic I removed the following statement:
Archive 1

Comments

I just cleaned up the "In other fields" section a bit, including rearranging some parts, alphabetizing, and splitting the "Six is:" list into two lists: one for things described by the word six or the numerical value 6 alone, and one for stuff known by names containing the word six or just generally more complicated descriptions that couldn't easily be fit into the "six is" framework. I hope the distinction will be clear by people reading (and especially editing) the page! Finally, perhaps the stuff on the prefixes hexa- and sex- should go in a separate section (e.g., "== ==")... - dcljr 05:10, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I removed the following statement:

The number of primary colors and secondary colors in the spectrum, not counting indigo. Wait a minute! The primary colors are either of 2 sets; the secondary colors are whichever one is not primary colors:

Additive: Red, Green, Blue Subtractive: Cyan, Magenta, Yellow

Of these 6 colors, only 5 are spectral; the one that is not is magenta. 66.245.5.127 23:33, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I just removed the statement "Six is the smallest number of distinct isosceles right triangles that will tile an isosceles right triangle." Unless I am completely misunderstanding this statement, not only can it be done with two or four, but I don't see how it can be done with six at all. --BBrucker2 (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

@BBrucker2 2603:6081:2940:71:CC07:252C:B5D5:EAE0 (talk) 16:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

6th anniversary name

Anniversary names are supposed to be Latin. However, several Internet sites say that the anniversary name for 6 is hexennial, which has a Greek prefix. The true Latinate name is "sexennial", as indicated at the list of anniversary names. Any opinions on this?? 66.32.251.228 00:06, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Numerology

!! I think we should add western and eastern numerological meanings here too !!

Military

I've found plenty of examples of the leader of a unit being called Six, with the XO being Five. I.E.: Rainbow Six refers to the leader of the Rainbow team. While this may be a fic reference, the callsign, at least in the US army, for a unit leader is 6. For example, Capt. H. R. McMaster, leader of 2nd ACR's Eagle Troop, was Eagle-66. I don't know the exact protocol for how this works, though. Someone more knowledgable on the subject, please post! 75.84.77.77 05:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree that this should be in the article - so I'm putting something in. I'd welcome anyone with more knowledge of the US Military to elaborate on that, especially how widespread its use is throughout the service branches, and through time, and where this tradition came from. --BjKa (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Reading about the Cub Scout "sixer" in the article, I wonder if that could be the origin... --BjKa (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Six as slang for buttocks

The "In Television" section lists six as a slang term for rear or buttocks. This is horribly inaccurate interpretation of the "cover my six" phrase. The six in that phrase refers to behind as on the position of the number six on a clock. Dragon224 18:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank god for Wikipedia

How else would I know that "In rugby league, [6 is] the position of 5/8"? Now I just have to figure out whether, in rugby league, 8 is the position of 5/6 or the position of 7/10. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.73.82 (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Organization of number pages and number disambiguation pages

Dear Colleagues,

There is an ongoing discussion on the organization of number pages and number disambiguation pages.

Your comments would be much appreciated!! Please see and participate in:

Thank you for your participation!

Cheers,

PolarYukon (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Bees

The cells of a beehive honeycomb are 6-sided Is that so? Looks roundish to me. Grey Geezer 06:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grey Geezer (talkcontribs)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

  • http://www.ngcic.org/
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:01:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 52 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:05:38, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Comment

Section name "Greek and Latin word parts". Speling12345 (talk) 2:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 6 (number). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Retired jersey numbers

Per WP:PRESERVE, here is the list of retired #6 jersey numbers and F1 cars that were mentioned in the article:

This material may be of interest for a future List of retired numbers in sports article. — JFG talk 22:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

In sports

I haven't been watching this for a while, but I think the number of points for a touchdown in various football (but not association football) and the position number of the shortstop in baseball seem relevant. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

"Hexa is classical Greek for six"

This is incorrect on a couple of counts:

Bingo names -

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

"1/6 (number)" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1/6 (number). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Soumyabrata (talksubpages) 11:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

"➅" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect . Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 20:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Neither prime nor square

What's up with this statement? "6 is the smallest positive integer which is neither a square number nor a prime number." That's not remotely true! There are infinitely many positive integers that are neither prime nor square. Quick proof: Take any integer n > 2. The square of an even number is always even, which means that n^2 + 2 is also even; therefore n^2 + 2 can't be prime. The difference between consecutive numbers is always odd, which means that n^2 + 2 can't be square either. Therefore, for all integers greater than 2, n^2 + 2 is neither prime nor square.

There are indeed infinitely many such numbers. 6, corresponding to n=2, is the smallest of them. Certes (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not sure why my brain turned "smallest" into "largest." Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:1E00:54C:A85D:F855:4CE7:1DF (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

"−6" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect −6. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31#−6 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Large Schröder number

Should it be added that six is a: Schroder number[1] ?

References

  1. ^ Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence A006318 (Large Schröder numbers)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation. Retrieved 2016-05-22.

"꤆" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 4#꤆ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)