Talk:Great Western Main Line upgrade

Electrification to Wales

FYI http://www.rail.co/2011/03/01/government-gives-green-light-for-new-trains-and-rail-electrification/ etc - the announcement has been made to electrify the line all the way to wales. Sf5xeplus (talk) 18:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/rail-electrification.pdf
  • In First Great Western on 2011-03-19 07:09:24, 404 Not Found
  • In 21st Century upgrade of the Great Western Main Line on 2011-06-19 05:27:53, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/iep/iepinvitationtotender/infrastructureinterface.pdf
  • In Great Western Main Line on 2011-03-22 12:41:53, 404 Not Found
  • In 21st Century upgrade of the Great Western Main Line on 2011-06-19 05:28:03, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.railway-technology.com/news/newsuk-opens-upgraded-swansea-railway-station

  Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

• http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/-hitachi-super-express-trains-uk/

  Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Reading - Basingstoke Branch

Although it would appear that First Great Western considers that this line will be electrified as part of the electrification of the Thames Valley branchlines (see https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/About-Us/greater-west/bagw/LTV) and is due to be completed in stage 2 of this scheme, the Draft CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan referred to under the entry Electric Spine clearly refers (p.45) to the electrification of the Reading - Basingstoke Line as part of that scheme (but suggests that it may not be delivered within CP5: see p.81). Is anyone able to explain this apparent discrepancy? Ntmr (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

future tense

This article has a lot of saying that such-and-such will happen. Aside from the fact that we cannot predict with certainty whether the work will be successfully completed as planned, it is also a maintenance headache because it means that even if everything does go to plan, the article will need constant revisiting to change future to past tenses at the right time. I think it is better to talk about what was proposed in the past (a completed event that we can report on) than what will happen in the future. I've changed a couple of bits but there is more to do. Thanks. Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Lowering of tracks

I've just come across this article and I'm not quite sure of its scope, but shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere that tracks are being lowered under bridges and through tunnels to accomodate the electrical supply. Someone recently added a reference to https://web.archive.org/web/20150921131849/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/great-western-route-modernisation/banes/ to the article on Dundas Aqueduct. Information has also been added to Box Tunnel based on this BBC Report.— Rod ^talk 17:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 21st-century modernisation of the Great Western Main Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110721130504/http://www.shares.ie/news/world-market-news/6765-%C2%A311bn-investment-electrify-rail to http://www.shares.ie/news/world-market-news/6765-%C2%A311bn-investment-electrify-rail

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110724023626/http://www.railnews.co.uk:80/news/general/2011/07/21-4000-jobs-to-go-in.html to http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2011/07/21-4000-jobs-to-go-in.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 21st-century modernisation of the Great Western Main Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120212102016/http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/rail-electrification.pdf to http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/rail-electrification.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Progress Details

I started a page with a table showing detailed progress, but was instructed to add the information to this one. Although it mostly shows electrification rather than signalling work and only information for the western end so far, I think it would fit best at the end. Feedback appreciated before I add it. Chris.Bristol (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 21st-century modernisation of the Great Western main line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413065743/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/uploadedFiles/networkrailcouk/Contents/Improvements/The_Great_Western/WesternVision.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/uploadedFiles/networkrailcouk/Contents/Improvements/The_Great_Western/WesternVision.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120901170231/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/rus%20documents/route%20utilisation%20strategies/great%20western/great%20western%20rus.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/rus%20documents/route%20utilisation%20strategies/great%20western/great%20western%20rus.pdf
• Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20170123080842/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/rail-electrification.pdf to http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/rail-electrification.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120708233227/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/100-million-Bristol-Metro-train-network-2016/story-16492523-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/100-million-Bristol-Metro-train-network-2016/story-16492523-detail/story.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130926172435/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Green-light-long-awaited-rail-improvements/story-16547255-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Green-light-long-awaited-rail-improvements/story-16547255-detail/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)