Talk:2022 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Newtothisedit in topic GA Review

Requested move 22 September 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


– Case norm, like the 3500 other men's basketball tournament articles, etc., recent moved to lowercase. Note: Need to get explicit consensus again to get bot help for about 200 moves with these patterns, including about 66 Templates and a bunch of championship game articles. Dicklyon (talk) 03:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Newtothisedit (talk · contribs) 18:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


What a game, glad to see it as a GA nominee. I have a few things on my plate but should start leaving comments in a few days.--Newtothisedit (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Newtothisedit I believe I've covered all of your suggestions; let me know if anything else needs to be done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looks good to me, I'll pass it. Congrats!--Newtothisedit (talk) 17:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Criteria

edit

Article meets GA criteria

Lead

edit
  • Add something about Kansas entering the game seeking their 4th title and UNC seeking their 7th. Most collegiate championships articles feature this in the lead
    •   Done
  • I'd add the specific score Kansas fell behind
    •   Done

Participants

edit
  • "a former Tar Heels player who took over for Roy Williams," add that Williams retired, right now it's unclear in the article of why Hubert took over.
    •   Done added mention that Williams retired
  • "most lopsided No. 8 vs. No. 9 seed in NCAA tournament history" change to "most lopsided No. 8 vs. No. 9 seed matchup in NCAA tournament history"
    •   Done didn't change to that exact wording, but I tried to make this more clear
  • Add mention of win over UCLA
    •   Done
  • "the tourney's underdog, Saint Peter's" to "the tourney's Cinderella, Saint Peter's"
    •   Done but I expanded "tourney's" to "tournament's"
  • "North Carolina's biggest rival, Duke" The wording of this is a little clunky. Maybe change to something along the lines of "arch rival Duke"
    •   Done changed "North Carolina's" to "their"
  • "Kansas received a No. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament" Add what region they were the 1 seed of
    •   Done
  • I'd add a sentence about Kansas's tournament path
    •   Done
  • "Martin had been their leading scorer in three games" to "Martin led the team in scoring in three games"
    •   Done didn't change to that exact wording, but I tried to improve this

Game summary

edit
  • "Bacot ended with 15 points and 15 rebounds, becoming the first to have a double-double in all six tournament games" to "Bacot ended with 15 points and 15 rebounds, becoming the first player to record a double-double in all six tournament games" make sure to hyperlink to double-double as well. You could also mention Bacot pursuing this in the participants section as Kansas currently has more player background in that section
    •   Done changed the word in Bacot's section, and double-double is already linked. I will look to potentially add a sentence or two about some UNC players in that section.
    • Note - just added some info about Bacot and another UNC player in their section.

Media coverage

edit
  • I'd add the viewership/rating the game got in this section
    •   Done couldn't readily find the Nielsen rating (if you can find it I will definitely add it) but I did add viewership information.
    • For some reason, I didn't spot the rating in the infobox until now; the source does not explicitly mention the rating that the telecast received (apparently 13.2), so I've commented that out for now.

Spot Checks

edit

References 3, 6 and 16 all match whats in article and are from reliable sources.