Talk:2015 FA Community Shield
 | 2015 FA Community Shield has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 26, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from 2015 FA Community Shield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 FA Community Shield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A close to flawless article. For one, I would recommend that in the "Background" section, you write having defeated Manchester City a year earlier instead of "ago". Sounds good? Also, there is a dead link that should be replaced with an archieved version.
On hold for now. Good job! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing, I've replaced the dead link and tweaked the background section. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2015 FA Community Shield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305035734/http://rsssf.com/tablese/engsupcuphist.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/engsupcuphist.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)