Wikipedia

Talk:2008 Orange Bowl

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Learn more about this page
Featured article2008 Orange Bowl is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 3, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed
January 31, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 22, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
September 22, 2009Featured topic candidatePromoted
March 31, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
August 31, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Neutrality

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

I think the neutrality of the article should be disputed. It says Kansas "earned" a trip to the Bowl, which, at least to me, reeks of bullshit.MonkeyBWest (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you're a Missouri fan, I can completely understand the sentiment. Regardless, the BCS committee thought Kansas had earned it enough to be selected, and well, here they are. JKBrooks85 (talk) 15:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The 109th SOS ranking is disputed. It has not appeared documented anywhere on the web, other than in articles like the one used here as a source. In reality, Sagarin has KU's SOS at 88. CBS has it at 74, a notch better than Southern California. Nothing of this sort says 109th. That number appeared out of thin air on the BCS selection show and apparently people have decided to run with it. Chade89 (talk) 03:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you throw down some citations to that effect? I'll double-cite the 109 ranking thing and insert some language about controversy. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I stand corrected. Looks like you already put a citation in there. I've polished up that section and tried to improve the readability. Let me know what you think. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I didn't add a citation, must have been someone else. Anyways, that section looks fine now. Really, the article in its entirety is very well done. Chade89 (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate it. I'm trying to keep an even-handed tone, and it's always good to get comments. JKBrooks85 (talk) 17:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good Article

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have reviewed this article thoroughly, and the only thing I could find wrong with it was a few typos (which I promptly fixed). Congratulations to all who helped in getting this article to GA status. RC-0722 (talk) 02:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Strength of Schedule

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Since there is clearly a POV being pushed here without regard to truth, I will make this known. The University of Kansas football team's strength of schedule was at one point 109 out of 119, but so were many other major schools. That is irrelevant for BCS selections. The only thing that matters for BCS selection is the strength of schedule AT THE TIME OF SELECTION. So let's look at the actual strength of schedule rankings that the BCS uses, shall we?

Sagarin has already been mentioned. Anderson & Hester: 67 / 119 (http://andersonsports.com/football/ACF_d097.html) Colley Matrix: 77 / 119 (http://www.colleyrankings.com/foot2007/rank15.html) Massey Ratings: can't find selection time ratings; current is 59 / 119 (http://www.masseyratings.com/rate.php?lg=cf)

These four SOS ratings are the ONLY ones that matter to the BCS selection committee, as they are the ONLY ones that go into the computer ratings for the BCS. http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/rankings

Remember, the BCS is 1/3 computer ratings, 1/3 Coaches Poll, and 1/3 Harris Poll.

This irrelevant nonsense about KU's schedule being 109/119 is completely inappropriate for an article that should be based on facts. If we include that, we should include the SOS for EVERY team for EVERY week throughout the season because undoubtedly many major college football programs have very low SOSs at some point during the season. Cherry picking statistics to push your POV is extremely unencyclopedic. 24.124.109.67 (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've scrubbed it up a bit more. If you could give a little more input on how you think it should read, I'd greatly appreciate it. JKBrooks85 (talk) 00:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image Image:Orange-Bowl-football-logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Winningest in sports articles under discussion

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 Orange Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2008_Orange_Bowl&oldid=1196521700"