Talk:2008 French mistaken virginity case

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 15 June 2021

Suggestions are welcome!

Feedback from New Page Review process edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: nice work!.

North8000 (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 June 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to 2008 French mistaken virginity case. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


The annulment of a marriage due to mistaken virginity2008 French mistaken virginity controversy – This article is about a specific incident rather than the general concept of annulling a marriage due to mistaken virginity. All the article's references are in French, so I do not think this event has an English-language WP:COMMONNAME. I am open to other suggestions. Rublov (talk) 17:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. The proposed title is undoubtedly more natural and precise than the current title. It still doesn't feel great, but I think this is a case where it's very difficult to come up with a non-awkward descriptive title. Colin M (talk) 21:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nominator and Colin M. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. But would prefer 2008 French mistaken virginity case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
    I agree, "case" is better than "controversy" here. Rublov (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
    I would support this option as well. And it's somewhat closer to the term used in the fr title, affaire. Colin M (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.