Talk:1983 World Championships in Athletics – Women's marathon

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1983 World Championships in Athletics – Women's marathon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 04:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 16:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   I've added an extra footnote to meet the hook citation requirement. feminist (talk) 03:32, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:1983 World Championships in Athletics – Women's marathon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Taking this review. MWright96 (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead edit

  • Think it would help to add the country Kaneko and May represented for consistency in the lead

Background edit

  • "though there was significant opposition" - from whom?
  • A bit of everyone; I'm not sure how much detail to go into here, given that the opposition was to its inclusion in the Olympics, rather than the World Championships. Essentially, the organisers of the Olympics, the "Soviet bloc", and you know, men. Harrias talk 08:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "announced that it would be added to the program" - should the word in bold be programme instead?
  • "Press in the United States rated Julie Brown" - How about amending the text in bold to The American press?
  • "Amby Burfoot said that despite the fact Waitz had beaten Brown in their previous meetings" - how many previous meetings?
  • Wikilink Amby Burfoot

Summary edit

  • Ireland should be wikilinked to the Republic of Ireland article, not to the article discussing the whole Island of Ireland
  • It shouldn't be linked at all. Removed. Harrias talk 08:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "Two miles later," - what about changing his text to say Two miles (3.2 km) for consistency?
  • "as there weren't men" - were not; no contractions please per MOS:CONTRACTION
  • Eugh, it's been a while since I've made that mistake. Fixed. Harrias talk 08:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • Wikilink Amby Burfoot in Reference 7 and The Hartford Courant
  • Wikilink The Boston Globe in Reference 8
  • Wikilink Kenny Moore in Reference 9
  • Linked all three, plus "The Atlanta Constitution". Harrias talk 08:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to respond/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 06:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: Thanks for the review. A few rookie errors in there; with the GA queue getting a bit longer again, I must admit to throwing this onto the nominations pile before completing my final read-through. Anyway, hopefully all resolved now. Harrias talk 08:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Harrias: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 08:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply