Talk:Through the Darkest of Times
(Redirected from Draft talk:Through the Darkest of Times)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by RoySmith in topic Did you know nomination
 | Through the Darkest of Times has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 21, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Through the Darkest of Times appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Through the Darkest of Times/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 17:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'll take this on. If you don't hear from me in a week, ping me. --ProtoDrake (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Sennecaster: I don't see anything that strictly holds the game back from becoming a GA. If you're intendeding to take this further, I'd advise that you archive all links. Otherwise Instant Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 18:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Through the Darkest of Times was the first video game published in Germany to use swastikas? Source: Campbell, Colin (2019-06-12). "Through the Darkest of Times is a game about Nazis, but you won't get to shoot them". Polygon. Retrieved 2022-07-26.
- Reviewed: N/A
- Comment: I'm not picky on the wording of this hook, feel free to propose alts. Second nom, no QPQ needed.
Improved to Good Article status by Sennecaster (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
@Sennecaster: Good article. Article is sourced, hook is interesting, and the QPQ is not needed. Approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2022 (UTC)