Open main menu

Wikipedia β

The Canaanite languages or Canaanite dialects[2] are one of the two subgroups of the Northwest Semitic languages, the others being the Aramaic language and Ugaritic language. They were spoken by the ancient Semitic people of the Canaan and Levant regions, an area encompassing what are today Israel, Jordan, Sanai, Lebanon, Syria, the Palestinian territories, and also some fringe areas of southern Turkey and the northern Arabian peninsula. The Canaanites, broadly defined to include the Israelites (including Judeans and Samaritans), Phoenicians (including Carthaginians), Amorites, Ammonites, Moabites, Edomites, Suteans, Ekronites and Amalekites. Hebrew has remained in continuous use by many Jews since that period, as a written language, a read language and by many people a spoken language as well. Slightly different dialects were used at different times but overall it is as much the Hebrew language as the various forms of Hebrew in the first Millennium BC were one language. All of the other Cannanite languages seem to have become by the early 1st millennium AD.

Canaanite
Geographic
distribution
Levant, Carthage
Linguistic classification Afro-Asiatic
Subdivisions
Glottolog cana1267[1]

This family of languages has the distinction of being the first historically attested group of languages to use an alphabet, derived from the Proto-Canaanite alphabet, to record their writings, as opposed to the far earlier Cuneiform of the region.

The primary reference for extra-biblical Canaanite inscriptions, together with Aramaic inscriptions, is the German-language book "Kanaanäische und Aramäische Inschriften", from which inscriptions are often referenced as KAI n (for a number n).[3]

Contents

Classification and sourcesEdit

The Canaanite languages or dialects can be split into the following:[2][4]

North CanaanEdit

South CanaanEdit

  • Hebrew has remained in continuous use by many Jews since that period, as a written language, a read language and by many people a spoken language as well. Slightly different dialects were used at different times but overall it is as much the Hebrew language as the various forms of Hebrew in the first Millennium BC were one language. All of the other Cannanite languages seem to have become by the early 1st millennium AD.

The main sources of Classical Hebrew are the various books of the Jewish Bible (Tanakh).

OtherEdit

Other possible Canaanite languages:

  • Ugaritic, although the inclusion of this language within Canaanite is disputed
  • The Deir Alla Inscription, written in a dialect with Aramaic and South Canaanite characteristics, which is classified as Canaanite in Hetzron.
  • Ekronite or Philistine Semitic - not to be confused with the non-Semitic (assumed Indo-European) Philistine language. The former is attested by several dozen inscriptions in Phoenician script scattered along Israel's southwest coast, in particular the Ekron Royal Dedicatory Inscription.


Comparison to AramaicEdit

Some distinctive typological features of Canaanite in relation to Aramaic are:

  • The prefix h- used as the definite article (Aramaic has a postfixed -a). That seems to be an innovation of Canaanite.
  • The first person pronoun being ʼnk (אנכ anok(i), versus Aramaic ʼnʼ/ʼny', which is similar to Akkadian, Ancient Egyptian and Berber.
  • The *ā > ō vowel shift (Canaanite shift).

DescendantsEdit

Modern Hebrew Hebrew has remained in continuous use by many Jews since that period, as a written language, a read language and by many people a spoken language as well. Slightly different dialects were used at duferent times but overall it is as much the Hebrew language as the various forms of Hebrew in the first Millennium BC were one language. All of the other Cannanite languages seem to have become by the early 1st millennium AD.

Slightly varying forms of Hebrew utilized from the First Millennium BC until modern times include:

The Phoenician and Carthaginian expansion spread the Phoenician language and its Punic dialect to the Western Mediterranean for a time, but there too it died out, although it seems to have survived slightly longer than in Phoenicia itself.

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian, eds. (2016). "Canaanite". Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 
  2. ^ a b Rendsburg 1997, p. 65.
  3. ^ For example, the Mesha Stele is "KAI 181".
  4. ^ Waltke & O'Connor (1990:8): "The extrabiblical linguistic material from the iron Age is primarily epigraphic, that is, texts written on hard materials (pottery, stones, walls, etc.). The epigraphic texts from Israelite territory are written in Hebrew in a form of the language which may be called Inscriptional Hebrew; this "dialect" is not strikingly different from the Hebrew preserved in the Masoretic text. Unfortunately, it is meagerly attested. Similarly limited are the epigraphic materials in the other South Canaanite dialects, Moabite and Ammonite; Edomite is so poorly attested that we are not sure that it is a South Canaanite dialect, though that seems likely. Of greater interest and bulk is the body of Central Canaanite inscriptions, those written in the Phoenician language of Tyre, Sidon, and Byblos, and in the offshoot Punic and Neo-Punic tongues of the Phoenician colonies in North Africa. An especially problematic body of material is the Deir Alla wall inscriptions referring to a prophet Balaam (ca. 700 BC), these texts have both Canaanite and Aramaic features. W. R. Garr has recently proposed that all the Iron Age Canaanite dialects be regarded as forming a chain that actually includes the oldest forms of Aramaic as well."

BibliographyEdit

External linksEdit