Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 198

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 195 Archive 196 Archive 197 Archive 198 Archive 199 Archive 200 → Archive 205

Producer James Worthy

Page was deleted due to "copyright infringement" from reverbnation. I would like to have an opportunity to change the biography although it was written by a source of James Worthy for his continued use and was written specifically for a purpose such as Wikipedia. At this time, I have no problem re-writing the biography for use for Wikipedia and would love to get the opportunity to do so! I am new at Wikipedia, so I have been trying to find out how to contact the administrator that deleted the page also. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by CValrie (talk • contribs)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. You must re-write it from scratch, as admins will not restore obvious copyright violations or send yu a copy of the deleted article (on the grounds that you still have access to the source the article was copied from). Note that "a purpose such as Wikipedia" is, if I assume correctly, actually disallowed as Wikipedia's license requires the ability to re-use the content in any context provided all requirements are met (see our content licence for more details). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • You can start again and rewrite the draft again using different text not the same as any other web site. All except the first sentence seems to have been copied. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • CValrie, I'd also recommend that you read over Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy, as well as the conflict of interest guidelines (since it looks like you're likely someone working for him). The other issue with the article other than copyright is that the article was also fairly promotional in tone, a common issue with articles that were taken from somewhere else. It's also fairly common for people with a conflict of interest to miss promotional tones because they're closely affiliated with the subject or they're part of a marketing crew that frequently uses promotional WP:BUZZWORDS in their daily work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bill You (powerlifter)

I, 64.180.36.203, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 64.180.36.203 (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I've moved this to Draft:Bill You (powerlifter). It looks like there had been an earlier attempt at the article that had also been G13'd, so that was restored as well. I've reverted the article to that version since it contained more information, whereas the more recent edits only had an infobox. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ray Carr

I, 2602:306:3130:9520:6572:63F0:774F:8EE7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:3130:9520:6572:63F0:774F:8EE7 (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I need to note that this was previously requested for restoration here. This still has some of the same issues with tone and sourcing that I brought up last time. Can you show some sort of in-depth coverage to prove that this person is notable? If not, then I'm not really sure what restoring this would really accomplish since it's been declined so many times already. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Also, if this is restored it'd likely need to be edited to remove the puffery. There were several WP:PEACOCK phrases in there, not to mention several things that had no bearing on Carr as far as Wikipedia is concerned. For example, why is it important to note that one of his children is single and a rapper? That's fairly WP:INDISCRIMINATE information that makes the article seem more promotional and in so doing, makes Carr seem less likely to be notable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I wrote a draft for an article on Ray Carr - a local disc jockey, which was deleted in May WITHOUT NOTIFYING me in my e-mail. I have tried repeatedly to get advice on chat, and some help with rewrites, but, apparently, I never seem to get it good enough for Wikipedia to accept it. I'm told the man is "not notable", and I don't agree, and could add a lot more than is there now, if the page would be undeleted. I tried following the instructions on how to do this, and I don't know if it went through. Can someone PLEASE help me with this? I just want to get it DONE and PUBLISHED ALREADY. THANK YOU. Here is the code I used for my request: -CVActor1 (talk) 08:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • CVActor1, I'm merging this since it's the same request. My basic request here is that you show some sort of proof that things might turn out differently if we restored this again. This was declined several times by different editors and it contained a lot of promotional language. (Plus the amount of links on the article constitute WP:ELSPAM.) All I'm asking for is some sort of proof that there might be more coverage that would potentially change the outcome this time. I'm not saying no, I just want something to show that this time might be different. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • It also looks like you were notified about the page's deletion on your talk page. Normally this does send an alert to your mail, but sometimes e-mail accounts will put messages from Wikipedia in the junk folder and occasionally people will have outdated e-mail addresses linked to Wikipedia or may disable the "send e-mail alerts" function. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Basically the concern about the article's sources was that they were all local ones, which are greatly depreciated on Wikipedia by many members. Several of the sources were also WP:PRIMARY, meaning that they were released by Carr or someone/something affiliated with him, and some like this one aren't even about Carr himself but are about one of his sons. These will not be able to show notability since it is within the best interests of Carr and places associated with him (like the YMCA) to write about him and notability cannot be inherited (WP:NOTINHERITED) by his children gaining coverage. Being a radio DJ does not automatically give him notability either and I'll note that this is actually very difficult for most DJs to accomplish in general since there are so many out there. It's also generally accepted that local radio personalities will host local events, so just being a host for something does not guarantee notability either. The only source that looked like it could be usable to help show notability was The Sun Newspapers article, which I'm going to assume is a local paper. There is the possibility that the article from the Plains Dealer could show notability, but just the title gives off the impression that the article was about an event and that if Carr is mentioned, it's only in passing. This would make it a WP:TRIVIAL source, which cannot show notability either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Amica International

Amica is an European brand of home appliances. All I added is a small piece of their history. That's nothing to do with promotion because I've seen many other companies like Beko, Electrolux, Bosch. I would like to know what was the reason to delete it?! Thank you! -JustWorking (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. @JustWorking: It read as promotional content in a number of ways. It spoke to the reader in the first person "we", "our", "us" and editorialized about the product in a glowing light ("...started to be trusted..." – says who just the facts, no gloss. More importantly, it was a copyright violation of Amica's website, copying and pasting its non-free copyrighted expression. We do not undelete copyright violations. For a proper article to be attempted, it would need to cite to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected with Amica, writing about it in detail. That article should be written by someone without a conflict of interest.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Undefined/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op/JBFan4

I made a request for undeletion and my responsible to restore the page, then I can have a page test and been good forever -JBFan4 (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done as this page was not in an appropriate place for testing. Instead please use your userspace with a name such as User:JBFan4/sandbox or User:JBFan4/Co-op or whatever other sensible name you want after the /. To use Wikipedia:Co-op type "JBFan4" into the username box and click on the blue button. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wibu-Systems AG

I, Thomricci, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thomricci (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I would like to address comments by the reviewers and resubmit the article. I didn't realize you could leave the page for more than 6 months without editing. Thomricci (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drug2Gene

I, 46.10.208.211, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.10.208.211 (talk) 13:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Gunnex

By unknown reason my user page User:Gunnex was deleted. I did NOT requested the deletion but it might be that I accidentally played with some deletion templates (and stored it unintentionally) as I am involved in deletion of copyrighted files which were originally uploaded here, later transferred to Commons and deleted there. So, please restore my user page. Thx. -Gunnex (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  Done You placed a speedy delete tag yourself suggesting it was a copyright violation! Use <nowiki>{{db-F7}}</nowiki> or whatever if you want the wikitext without the action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Potters_house_chennai_church

The People Here in this locality have greater difficulty in finding and locating Churches, as it is newly developed area. This page will definetly serve lots of purpose in talking the information to the locals

That isn't Wikipedia's purpose. I have accordingly tagged The Potters House Chennai Church for speedy deletion (Criterion G11). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 13:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
This page needs to be rewritten to be an encyclopedia entry rather than an advert. You will need independent references to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/Feefo

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Johndesmond (talk) 07:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 13:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • The AfC draft is a LOT newer than the most recent revisions on that subpage - as in, past couple years. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 13:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • True, but the OP asked for Feefo, and it still has life in userspace. I will not restore the draft unless the OP proposes some action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I assume that the OP was asking for the AfC draft specifically, since they used the AfC preloaded form, and it's not the first time someone asking for undeletion of a draft omitted the prefixes. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 13:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GeoPackage

I, Fish154, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fish154 (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Check my User:Fish154/sandbox for the new version.

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Are you going to paste your sandbox into the AFC page? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Jaryn Satterfield

I, Jpfthebest, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jpfthebest (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  • @Jpfthebest: I restored this back in August last year and you did not touch it. What do you plan to do with this submission? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Pro Motion, Inc.

I, Zenironman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. More articles to show notability are available -Zenironman (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Public Law Outline

Please un-delete Draft:Public Law Outline S.tollyfield (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Vivienne Harvey

I, Jamesjefferies, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamesjefferies (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drug2Gene

The article was deleted under the G13 (Abandoned Articles for creation submissions) general criterion for speedy deletion. The submission was previously declined on 20 March 2014 because of lack of independent reliable sources verifying the provided information and fail in proving notability. Circumstances have changed, four independent citations have become available since then. I would like to retrieve the draft in order to edit the page content with respect to the commented issues, and re-submit it -Latimeria bg (talk) 12:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC)}}

Proposed article has already been restored as per request above. --Finngall talk 14:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Zeeshan haider

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Shani302 (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Zeeshan haider

Article had been speedily deleted per WP:CSD#A7. --Finngall talk 20:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Please restore my wikipedia page i really need that i'm a singer thanks "Save page" button below -Shani302 (talk) 21:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. @Shani302: No. Wikipedia is not here for your publicity purposes. You don't "need" a page here. We have a strict policy on this, see WP:NOTPROMOTION. Also see Wikipedia:Autobiographies -- you should not be writing articles about yourself. If you're a singer, you need to meet one of the criteria in WP:MUSICBIO before an article about you will be accepted. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

World Cheerleading Championships

It's very important for young cheerleaders to explore the history of our World Championships. The USASF does not have a page dedicated to world champions past the year 2009, and this page had every single top 3 team from the beginning (2004), to the most recent (2015). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.126.240 (talk • contribs)

Article by this name was speedily deleted per author's request last week. No old AfC candidates found under this title--closest I could find is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cheerleading World Championship, which is decidedly not ready for mainspace. --Finngall talk 21:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
See also Talk:U.S. All Star Federation#World Cheerleading Championships. In short, the history still contains all of the content. It was forked to the above-linked, G7'ed page, and the content was thereupon removed from U.S. All Star Federation. However, the person who forked it apparently found that much of it was unverifiable and chock full of errors where verification was even possible, so the forked content article was deleted, and it was also not revived in the original article. Please note the requirements of WP:BURDEN. If this is to be returned to the article, having been challenged, it will require citations to reliable sources through inline citations that verify the information.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Probably a good idea to ping the forker.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Fuhghettaboutit is pretty much dead-on; with almost no reliable verification of the information found on the page (even the information from 2015) I figured it would be best to nuke it and start from scratch. I didn't realise there was a draft page already started (even though it's rather nonexistent), so it would be a good idea to work on that page and do it properly. Primefac (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Disc Makers

I, Ender9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ender9 (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Recently G13 deleted as Draft:Disc Makers. --Finngall talk 20:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Kimlou813/Frugal Fashionista Clothing Swap™

I, Kimlou813, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kimlou813 (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

The information that was deleted is 100% true. I didn't even know it was deleted until I came back this morning to make some additions. My info can be verified here:

  • www.frugalfashionistaclothingswap.org
  • and a news cast from Voice of America here: www.voanews.com/media/video/1652262.html
  • www.washingtonpost.com/local/clothing-swaps-the-new-antidote-to-a-down-e...
  • www.washingtonian.com/blogs/shoparound/shopping/fashion-agenda-book-hill...
  • www.washingtonian.com/events/2013/04/08/frugal-fashionista-plus-size-clo...
  • www.washingtonian.com/articles/best-of-washington/best-of-washington-201...
  • a magisto movie I made this afternoon: www.magisto.com/video/MVEGIVUGHDI2ThZiCzE
@Kimlou813:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I'll add the the article appears now to exist for publicity purposes, and as such it would not be acceptable. Good luck in bringing it up to acceptable standards. Please see Wikipedia:Golden rule for brief guidance on what we expect. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ines Temple

I would like to edit the page with citing references to see if I can re-submit and get it accepted -Swissmit (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

@Swissmit:   Done. No article by that title has ever existed on Wikipedia. However, restored User:Swissmit/sandbox, which you had asked to be deleted previously. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_for_women

This page is about a gender equality project started from the way certain services are provided and involving the industry. It is not advertising. No link to companies, products or services is provided. The article does not use commercial language. There is no reason for deletion -- unless the administrador did not understood the issue or does not like the theme. -Jacintobettencourt (talk) 07:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done This could likely also be deleted with an A7 reason too. However if you want this as a draft I will get it back for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kate Petley

Not finished editing page. Idiot comments to prior edits. -Mnelsonp (talk) 01:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Insulting other users doesn't help your case at all. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Animall/Cardio First Angel

I, Bluerasberry, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Muktar Yahya Najee al-Warafi

Muktar Yahya Najee al-Warafi is in the news again. I am requesting userification. Al Warafi's lawyers have submitted multiple habeas petitions, that have triggered extensive third party commentary. In 2011 his lawyers pointed out that he had been serving the Taliban as a medic, and, as such, he should have never been classified as an "enemy combatant", since, as a noncombatant medic, he was not a combatant, by definition. (This claim was ultimately rejected because he couldn't prove he had been a fulltime medic.) In 2015, after a January 2015 announcement by President Obama that the USA's combat operations in Afghanistan were overed, his lawyers argued that the Geneva Conventions only authorized captor nations to detain individuals for the duration of hostilities. Geo Swan (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Panther Games

I, Volrath2002, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Volrath2002 (talk) 09:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Hrvoje Spajić

I, Champollion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Champollion (talk) 11:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Hrvoje Spajić Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Daphne Lee Martin

I added a notable musician page, with a biographical history, including awards and reviews and no advertising at all, along with many references. Why is this being considered advertising? Many many bands have similar pages. Is there something I can do to make it better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DameCalico (talk • contribs) 18:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (NawlinWiki (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. It got deleted because the article itself reads like an advert and would need to be completely rewritten to remove the promotional tone. Sources have no bearing on a G11; tone is everything. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  Not done and will not be done. The article was written in a tone so promotional that it would need to be rewritten from scratch. From the lead paragraph that goes "Forever blending genres in the legacy of the great Tin Pan Alley songwriters, Daphne takes beloved traditional southern roots sounds and.... As always, the lyrics are fermented and distilled in a bathtub full of misfit Interbellum prose" — and it doesn't get any better. No way will promotional text like that be restored. Wikipedia is not a publicity platform.
You are free to try again, preferably going through Wikipedia:Articles for creation because it is clear you have a conflict of interest on this topic. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
I was quite surprised by what struck me as a tone of non-cooperation here. I went to refresh my memory as to the wording of WP:CSD#G11, and Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion. I don't see either wikidocument saying "As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else".

I then used our internal search engine, to search the entire wikipedia for this specific phrase @Jéské Couriano: used. It turned up 21 instances. The first was a template under Jéské Couriano's main user page. The other 20 instances are all places where User:Jéské Couriano used this template: 173, 174, 175,176, 178, 180, 181, 183,184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 197.

Do either WP:CSD#G11 or Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION require a complete rewrite from scratch? G11 says it should be applied to articles that require a "fundamental rewrite".

Who says "fundamental rewrite" is synonymous with a "complete rewrite from scratch"?

My understanding of the administrator's mandate is that administrator's actions are not, generally, supposed to be punitive, rather, they are supposed to be educational. Aren't even blocks supposed to be educational, a way of getting the attention of contributors who have ignored warnings that they have been making serious lapses from policy?

It seems to me that forcing someone to rewrite an article, from scratch, is punitive. They have to go and find references, all over again. @DameCalico: seems to be a newbie, and I think the responses here are lapses from WP:BITE. A newbie has to figure out, all over again,the templates we use for references, and how we format lists and tables. Unnecessarily making them learn all that, a second time, is deeply punitive.

In my opinion, there is no notable topic that can't be written from a neutral point of view.

I don't know User:DameCalico, User:Jéské Couriano or User:Amatulic, and I had never heard of Daphne Lee Martin. But I just googled her, and, if DameCalico is correct, and the deleted article did contain sufficient valid reference, I'll bet that the neutralizing bias-ectomy that a successful G11 requires is actually trivial.

I request userification, so I can test to see whether the neutralizing bias-ectomy is as trivial as I suspect. Geo Swan (talk) 13:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

@Geo Swan: Declining to restore an advertisement to main article space is not punitive. We don't tolerate ads, particularly when they are written by PR representatives whose objective is to promote rather than inform, as was the case here. WP:AFC is the proper venue, not main space.
Requesting userfication, on the other hand, is reasonable, and I am sure the deleting administrator NawlinWiki would agree. So I have restored it to User:Geo Swan/Daphne Lee Martin for you to examine, improve, move to draft space, and/or request deletion.
  Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

East wind condos

real building in ponce inlet, Florida. -TristanAlessi612 (talk) 11:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedily deleted four times thus far, most notably per WP:CSD#A11 (obviously invented). --Finngall talk 13:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  Not done Reference does not support page, and no reason to have this on Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Church Street

The article at Church Street is currently a disambiguation page. That's appropriate. In 2006 the article there was about a particular Church Street, the one in Toronto. That was inappropriate. What should have happened is it should have been moved to Church Street (Toronto). In 2006 there was a flood of AFD of articles on Toronto streets, and this article on Church Street was deleted. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church Street.

On June 25th I left a request on the closing administrator's user talk page, asking for them to graft the revision history of the original now deelted article to the beginning of Church Street (Toronto). About a month later I left that administrator a reminder. They haven't yet replied. So, could a more helpful administrator graft the history from Church Street, deleted in 2006, and graft it to the beginning of Church Street (Toronto)?

IMO, Church Street (Toronto) was then and is now a notable street, one that I think measures up to GNG. But, I don't want to start from scratch. Given a version existed in 2006, I should be able to look at it, and use it as a start to preparing a new version which made the street's compliance with GNG undeniable.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Jethro Jacoob Candelon Zulueta

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -112.207.128.26 (talk) 07:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


Tarundeep Singh Anand

I have set correct citation links also Mr Tarundeep singh anand bio is perfect to write kindly undelete the page and let me know if any changes required -Ubskjt (talk) 03:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (DaGizza (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done It looked like a promotional CV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Since recreated by the requestor and speedily deleted per WP:A7 and WP:G11 again. --Finngall talk 12:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yassin Hall

Need references and sources from it to create new page. -Friersow (talk) 10:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Sunshine Coast Football

Was the process for removing articles that the subject of the article wishes Wikipedia to remove followed in this case? -Ottawahitech (talk) 09:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

On a related note, is "I don't want this here" a valid PROD reason? Primefac (talk) 09:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Any PROD reason is valid if the PROD remains for 7+ days. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
That's correct. And any request to restore an article deleted by PROD is also valid, under most circumstances. @Primefac: or @Ottawahitech: are you requesting restoration, or just asking a question? ~Amatulić (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Amatulic, if the answer to my question had been "no" then I would be requesting a refund. However, if it's valid then I'm not particularly bothered. Primefac (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
@Primefac: To clarify, WP:IDONTLIKEIT (which is basically what this was), isn't a valid reason to delete any article, prod or otherwise. Bear in mind that an administrator isn't obligated to delete an article that's had a prod on it for 7 days. If this article had been well-sourced with evidence of notability, I would decline to delete it if the only reason given was "the subject doesn't want this article here".
However, in this case, the article had no references to coverage in independent reliable sources. It also didn't have any claim of significance, which might have qualified it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. Even if it had a claim of significance, I doubt it would have survived AFD. Therefore, I would have deleted this article if I had found it prodded for 7+ days, even if the reason given in this case was bogus. There would be more valid reasons to put in the prod tag. Likely, the deleting administrator reached the same conclusion.
Because it was deleted by PROD, I am happy to restore it, or move it to your user space for you to examine and improve, if you want. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Ah, so it was a bit more of an WP:IAR than a proper PROD. Keeping it deleted is fine, I have too many not-notable articles to fix already. Thanks for the offer, though. Primefac (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Please restore, and let someone take it to wp:AFD if they are so inclined. I do not do any work in anything sports related, but I happened to notice this wp:PROD and did not get a chance to save it before was deleted. It was contributed to by several (many?) editors over some years, and IIRC belonged to a couple of WikiProjects. The nominator did not notify the article creator of the nomination. There seem to be a very large number of other articles which linked to it:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Sunshine_Coast_Football. Ottawahitech (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ottawahitech:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Zulueta championship

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -112.210.41.37 (talk) 09:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Fram (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Europeans Party

They are an active political party who ran candidates in 2015 UK elections and have an active website : http://europeansparty.org/ -Benawu2 (talk) 03:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted twice: once in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7, and once in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G2. If you believe that either of these decisions were made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletions, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Peridon (talk · contribs) or user Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

weeowey

I created this page so that my fans could get to know me and I will add to this page over time -Weeowey (talk) 01:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

That's not what Wikipedia is for. Please look into Facebook or similar social media websites. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
  Not done per above. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Geometry Dash

dont delete this becauseisagood guide and a good article this dont need deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpo2 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Article exists and is currently under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geometry Dash --Finngall talk 23:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Menna Ahmed

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -197.35.28.144 (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title is correct? Checked in Draft, somewhat in user, and in AfC space, both capitalised and all lowercase; all titles were blank. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
  Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Accredo Business Software Ltd

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -114.23.133.93 (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nemrud (band)

I, Ulgen1368, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ulgen1368 (talk) 07:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The David Berning Company

Speedy deletion too speedy; request fair attempt to reword to suit every whim and hidden agenda -TubeGod (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phyllis McCrady

I, 68.149.145.8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Am gathering data to update.68.149.145.8 (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/America's First Federal Credit Union

I, Zasylvan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. affcu (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed request -- note that requestor's username is actually Zasylvan, so there's no username violation, just a clear indication of conflict of interest. --Finngall talk 16:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Brian Redban

He is co creator of some of the most popular podcasts ever and a great up and coming comedian don't understand why his page keeps getting deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.209.160 (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Mainspace article was deleted in 2012 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Redban. AfC draft Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brian Redban was deleted per G13 in January 2014. --Finngall talk 16:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Redban, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Colectica

Widely used and recognized research software toolset -smithd (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Plunet BusinessManager

The article was originally deleted because of unproper references. I would like to edit the article in near future but I have deleted my original document. The deleted wikipedia article is the only opportunity for me to receive the document. Otherwise I have to write the whole text (+sources etc.) again. -BenLie21 (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. That said, an admin can send you the text of the last deleted revision via email if you have it enabled in your preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wild Ones Natural Landscapers

I, 71.176.77.155, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.176.77.155 (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Berkeley Partnership

I, Ahar78, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ahar78 (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

@Ahar78:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kristyn Harris

I, DavidBailey, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DavidBailey (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

@DavidBailey:   Done §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Plunet BusinessManager

I, BenLie21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BenLie21 (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

@BenLie21:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_198&oldid=1136434683"