Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 181

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 175 ← Archive 179 Archive 180 Archive 181 Archive 182 Archive 183 → Archive 185

Suraj Gowda

I had go through all your suggested links and I had understand your notability requirements. I feel the subject meets your requirements because I had mentioned all the verifiable evience and also it's outside of Wikipedia as per notability guidelines. And he is a celebrity so also it's not a permastub. Our references are from good news sources and net blogs as mentioned in Wiki guideleines. So I request you to plz re-consider it. Thankyou.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakulmehra (talk • contribs) 06:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

The article has deleted due to un-notable issue. But I had included relevant good sources in my article and also did modification in the article body text. I am researching on some more good sources and want to do improvement in article. -Nakulmehra (talk) 12:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Suraj Gowda. At minimum, you are going to have to show you understand our notability requirements before anyone will consider restoring it. Then you will have to take it to deletion review and explain why you feel the subject meets our requirements. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles of creation/Aaron Schwartz

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Aaron Schwartz (talk) 20:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. Please see WP:Autobiography. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
@Aaron Schwartz:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Aaron Schwartz. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please read WP:MUSICBIO and WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Veeramuthu ashokkumar

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Veeramuthu Ashokkumar (talk) 07:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done I'm sorry, but this was essentially a repost of a CV akin to what you'd see on LinkedIn. Wikipedia is not a place to host this type of material and as such it has been deleted. Please do not re-add the content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • See WP:NOTWEBHOST which explains how Wikipedia user pages are different from those on social-networking sites. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rentalcars.com

I, Physhed, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Physhed (talk) 10:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Mubashir Ma

this is an official article about musician Mubashir Ma. and the wikipedia link about him is there in his official website http://singlesofficial.in/#!mubashir/cans -SINGLESMusic (talk) 11:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

This is not deleted yet. However unless you provide some substantial, reliable independent references very soon, this is very likely to be deleted, and then it will not be coming back. A link to a Wikipedia article from an official web page is not any reason to keep it. You can also add the {{hangon}} tag and explain why this should not be deleted at talk:Mubashir Ma. But your efforts would be better used to find references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
It's deleted now, and it's ineligible for restoration on this page because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. @SINGLESMusic:, there are no "official" pages on Wikipedia. If you want an "official" page, you have to host it on your own server that you control. And if you are actually this musician or his representative, you should not be creating an article about him anyway, see WP:COI. Furthermore, you need to go to WP:CHU/Simple as soon as possible to change your username to something that represents only you and not your website, else your account will be blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Elizabeth Dougherty

Mlserio (talk) 22:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC) @Mlserio: If you're referring to Draft:Elizabeth Dougherty, it still exists and has not been deleted, so   Not done, nothing to do. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pyspread

I, Martin Manns, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Martin Manns (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? One G13 as WP:AfC/Pyspread and one as Draft:Pyspread. Are you actually going to work on this, or are you just abusing Wikipedia for SEO? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Martin Manns: The page was moved to Draft:Pyspread. But I will await an explanation of what will be done to improve the page before restoring, since it was restored before for 6 months with no action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Graeme Bartlett: I had created the article Pyspread, and it was rejected for notability reasons. After some time, I wanted to try again. However before I improved the article, I got valuable advice that led me to the conclusion that acception was unlikely at the time. Meanwhile, independent secondary sources on Pyspread have been published, e.g. an article in the LinuxUser magazine. Therefore, I would like to restore the old article for creation content, update content and sources and submit again. Martin Manns (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Martin Manns: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Captain Cuts

I, 76.175.29.107, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.175.29.107 (talk) 00:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page can no be found at Draft:Captain Cuts. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Șhk Żãman

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Musician bands (talk) 03:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure A3 deletions aren't overturned here, on the grounds that it'd be faster to just write an actual page than restore a page that's not even up to the level of a stub. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  Not done. User blocked as about the thirty-fifth sock of Sheikh Zaman ll. JohnCD (talk) 12:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gender Economics

I, Susannemoore, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Susannemoore (talk) 11:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

@Susannemoore:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Gender Economics. This draft has never been submitted for review: please complete and submit it as soon as convenient; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and check out WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research. . JohnCD (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

phoenix white

I did not have the opportunity to add all of the resources before my computer froze. I have all of the pertinent information required to meet the criteria. Please see. http://www.wetv.com/shows/match-made-in-heaven/cast/phoenix , http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/model-phoenix-white-attends-bob-marley-i-and-eye-the-photos-news-photo/461652687 , www.phoenix white.net, http://madamenoire.com/516540/exclusive-ne-yos-ex-girlfriend-opens-up-about-paternity-scandal-trying-to-find-love-on-match-made-in-heaven/ , http://www.kontrolmag.com/shes-so-sick-of-love-songs-but-not-love-phoenix-white-rises-in-life-love-match-made-in-heaven-mmih_wetv/ , http://www.dallasblack.com/blog/bumpitordumpit/PhoenixWhite , http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/celebrity-photographer-author-phoenix-white-arrives-at-the-news-photo/464800321 , -Agcreativegroup (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

In order:
  1. We cannot use cast listings as a source for anything, since the subject has an obvious connection to the show.
  2. We do not use images as sources.
  3. We cannot use the subject's own website as a source for anything but the most uncontroversial information (DoB, ethnicity, religion, etc.).
  4. We cannot use interviews with the subject except as above (for uncontroversial info).
  5. Kontrol appears to be a gossip magazine. We do not accept such as sources.
  6. We do not use blogs as sources unless the blogger is an expert in a subject and is speaking in his area of expertise.
  7. You need to change your username as soon as possible, as your present username violates our username policy.
—Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  Not done. Wikipedia is not for self-promotion. The book is published by Access Granted LLC, (Chairman and CEO: Phoenix White), and the article author AG Creative's blog is also about Phoenix White. Please read Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 12:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Vega Entertainment

Vega Entertainment is an Indian Movie Production House which produced 9 movies in Telugu and Kannada Languages. Please activate the page deleted page. below are the Wiki pages of some of the Vega Entertainment Movies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouija_%282015_film%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aayirathil_Iruvar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Manasulo_Shruti -Gayatri Iyer (Actress) (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vega Entertainment, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Champlain College

Szentiványi (talk) 16:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

@Szentiványi:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Champlain College. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Versatile Security

I, Thoren1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Still working on the page -Thoren1 (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

@Thoren1:   Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Lillian Masebenza

I, 152.33.49.231, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 152.33.49.231 (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Luizao/Luis Neira

I, Luizao, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Luizao (talk) 03:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC) I, Luizao, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Luizao (talk) 03:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)}} i would like to have the original overview of my articke to make the needed changes.Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Luizao (talk) 03:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done I've restored the history, although I do need to caution you that it appears that you may be writing an autobiography. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Russell Edwards

I, MarthaAnsara, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarthaAnsara (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)


Dear Friends, As I wrote a couple of weeks ago (and my apologies for not being very good at communication with you) I was in the very middle of adding better references to the article I was improving in response to the notice that it had been sitting idle too long when it suddenly disappeared and I couldn't retrieve it. Can you help? Thanks Martha Ansara MarthaAnsara (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Esquivalience/Lichess

Draft (not AfC) deleted as per my request three weeks ago. Since I would like to work on it again, I request the undeletion of the page. -Esquivalience t 03:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Esquivalience t 03:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

web application development company

I want to add more info about it industries in this article.I am not doing company's promotion. Please don't deleted this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajsh011 (talk • contribs) 08:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

  • This was also deleted by the same admin under the name Kbizsoft Solutions. I do see that you have a copy in your userspace and I'd recommend that you work on improving that before placing it in the mainspace again. Offhand what I can see is that you have only sourced this using WP:PRIMARY sources, which cannot show notability. You need to use sources that are independent and reliable, by which I mean coverage in newspapers and the like. Official websites/pages or routine database listings do not count towards notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Sachin G Lokapure

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -117.200.184.108 (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. This page has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin G Lokapure, and that is where you should comment. First, read Wikipedia:Notability (people) and WP:DISCUSSAFD. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Life and it's Grafitti

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -77Gerrysun (talk) 13:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. I presume you mean User:77Gerrysun/sandbox, but there would be no point restoring that, because it is not an encyclopedia article, it is a personal essay giving your opinions about the issue of litter. See WP:NOTESSAY #3, and for advice on how to write acceptable articles read WP:Your first article. You might find some ideas about where to publish your essay at WP:Alternative outlets. JohnCD (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Some Hearts (song)

Deleted for not being a Top 10 hit. However, at least two artists recorded it, and one took it to #12 on a major chart, so it likely does meet WP:NSONGS and just needed an expansion, not deletion. -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 15:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Gamerafts

Husnainali12 (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC) The page i created was deleted. I want a restoration just because Gamerafts is a company in Pakistan that intends to be important. There are several posters on the walls in Pakistan indicating that the company will launch their first game in 2016 and its still an upcoming company. When the game will be released the company Gamerafts will start its journey from there. This topic is important just because it is the second game developing company in Pakistan after Mndstorm studios. I want to continue my work on it. please restore my page just because i want to work on it. This is an important company and deleted under A7. This page should be restored because several industry owners and software engineers have caught attention of Gamerafts work.

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Gilliam (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. Furthermore your own admission that they will be reeleasing their first game in 2016 means that this is future speculation on the comapny's notability. A lot can happen in 9 months, doubly so in the video game world. Further, Mndstorm does not have an article here, so the claim by reference of annother company that doesn't have a article here does not inspire confidence in the viability of the article. Hasteur (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Not that this seriously affects the undeletion decision, but: To be fair, the requestor is undoubtedly referring to Mindstorm Studios (which is a redirect to the company's sole release, Cricket Revolution). --Finngall talk 16:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Doris Gwaltney

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dfreres (talk) 20:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

have new information to add / edit.

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Gamesyouloved

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gamesyouloved (talk) 23:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Hi - I was entering the article for gamesyouloved and had some text in there but lost connection and was unable to complete and finishing my writing - can I resubmit a new original entry for gamesyouloved please?

thank you

  • Your user page was deleted as an advertisement. This will not be restored as it was an advertisement. Please read WP:COI since your user looks to be the same as your article. If you plan to include this text: "Imagine you were young again" then it will be inappropriate for Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EHSAN JAHANI

I, Ehsanjahani, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. EHSAN JAHANI 11:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ehsanjahani:   Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.
Also, please review WP:Notability (people) and WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

select bazar

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Indserman (talk) 10:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (JohnCD (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Derek Foran

Player made start today (and got a yellow card) for Sacramento Republic FC of the United Soccer League listed as fully professional in WP:FPL -Nfitz (talk) 05:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC). See [1]. Normally I'd contact the closing Admin however they haven't been active in over 6 years. Nfitz (talk) 05:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

  Done by User:Number 57. Wizardman 16:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

File:UAEU_Reem_Al_Marzouqi.png

Immediate deletion as {{db-f7}}. "Uploader forgot to add {{Non-free promotional}} before or after his {{Non-free use rationale}}" doesn't match one of the two reasons for immediate deletions. There's a bot asking for the missing license, based on a 2…7 days timeout to fix it. -Be..anyone (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done The reason it was deleted was because pictures of living people here cannot be used under fair use. So adding a promotional tag won't help it stay. Instead we need someone to go and take a free photo of the person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Centre for Women, Ageing and Media

Deletion didn't take into account modifications made after their initial comments -MaudeG3 (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Stein Elling Wirum

I, Helmword, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Helmword (talk) 03:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

george reich

I am Anthony Morgann the copyright owner and the administrator of the website Georgereich.com, all the words I provided to Wikipedia about George Reich Dancer, Choreographer, Director, Actor were authored by me and I give Wikipedia my permission to publish these words provided. In addition all the information can be authenticated through photos, screen credits on related movies, and various references within Wikipedia subjects, such as George Reich in the Cast as Christian the lead Dancer in the movie Black Tights here is the Wikipedia link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Tights ; also on Wikipedia the movie School For Love, is a French drama film from 1955, directed by Marc Allégret, written by Marc Allégret, starring Brigitte Bardot and Jean Marais, George Reich is in the Cast as Dick the lead Dancer who danced with Brigitte Bardot here is the Wikipedia link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_for_Love ; also on IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0716934/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 : on IBDB http://www.ibdb.com/person.php?id=1399 thank you, Anthony Morgann -Anthonymorgann (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

When this request was made, the article existed. It had been deleted twice before for copyright infringement but has been recreated each time. I've deleted it again. If necessary, I'll salt it until the copyright issue is resolved. The author must submit a request using WP:OTRS regarding his claim that he is the author of the website. We cannot accept his word. The OTRS team will then investigate.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Anthonymorgann, you may actually just want to re-write it in general since the page didn't really fit Wikipedia's guidelines for style and tone. The thing about posting content used in other locations is that in most cases it's written to promote the person/topic. While this works on personal or official websites, it isn't really appropriate for Wikipedia since it doesn't come across as a neutral and encyclopedic entry. The article wasn't over the top promotional but it was very casually written and phrases like "His award-winning shows are still garnering much applause on many of the Carnival Cruise Lines' vessels" just aren't really appropriate for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

royal engineering

I, Postnow 123, would like to request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under A7. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I had to make an edits on the article to make it notable & significant. Thank you for your consideration. -Postnow 123 (talk) 06:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Article drafts are not eligible for A7 deletions, and A7 deletions are not overturned at this page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done To overturn an A7 you would normally have to ask the closing admin to restore it and barring them doing that, go through deletion review. However since the page was a copyright violation from this website, the odds are slim that this would be restored on Wikipedia because even if by chance permission was granted to use the website's text, it would still be far too promotional to put on Wikipedia. Also I have to note that when writing an article title, avoid using all capital letters and make sure that the spelling is correct before submitting it to the mainspace. This may seem nitpicky, but if someone is looking for the article they may not find it under that spelling. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jim.Callahan,Orlando (talk) 00:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Knetphils/Aldanmar Apartments

I, Knetphils, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Knetphils (talk) 11:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Students Awating for guest during Dimensions fest.jpg

This image depicts the festival of the college, and forms a vital part of the article of the college (V. G. Vaze College). This image should not have been deleted! Kindly, restore it back. -AlwaysHappy (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

According to the deletion rationale, it was deleted because it is possible to either create a new image and release it under a free license or upload one that already exists and is freely licensed. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done there was no fair use rationale. However if you propose one here that is acceptable, then it will be read. As Jeremy says the iamge must not be replaceable by another picture either already taken or posed again and taken. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Centrik Afrye

There is new and reliable information on this topic -Bulawayan94 (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

@Bulawayan94:   Done six days ago the first time you asked, see the response here. The page is at User:Bulawayan94/Centrik Afrye ready for you improve. JohnCD (talk) 14:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

List of African supercentenarians

I would like to complain about the article's deletion. I can't see any substantial reason for this move to have been done. In my opinion, the article hasn't broken any of the Wikipedia guidelines. What is more, this article was not eligible for speedy deletion because it had changed substantially since 2010. Both deletions in 2015 failed to notify the article creator or give sufficient time for the article creator to address any issues or appeal the "prod" before the deletion occurred. The article itself serves as an useful piece of information and educates the society, how long can the people truly live on the entire African continent. The list contained 8 names of verified supercentenarians to have lived in Africa, which is not too few for a list. For the reasons above, I am to compain about the decision of deletion and if my arguments are fair, I'd like to ask for the article recreation. Sincerely. Waenceslaus (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC) -Waenceslaus (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  Not done @Waenceslaus: You'll have to do that at WP:DRV, assuming the arguments for deletion in the original AFD have been addressed somehow. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Well, FRF is correct that it can't be restored unilaterally. However, I would think 4 years is long enough for consensus to change (Especially considering many similar article) and would recommend a new AfD. If The Blade of the Northern Lights or Stifle agree to restore it here, then great. Otherwise, I will take it to DRV myself. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment - User has recreated the article with a different title instead of taking it to deletion review. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Lame. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Hwee-Boon Yar

Relevant references

@Tangoharris:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Bgwhite (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux

I, 2600:1012:B100:62F4:4DBF:D993:D01D:B0F0, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:1012:B100:62F4:4DBF:D993:D01D:B0F0 (talk) 00:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

  • I restored this before and no one improved it. What do you propose to do to improve this draft? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:06, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done - The page was also largely a copyright violation of [2]. If you think Devereaux meets our inclusion criteria, feel free to start a new draft using your own words, but text copied from elsewhere on the Internet cannot be accepted. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

IRFAN SHAHID

I, Abusheeth, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abusheeth (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page can now be found at Draft:Irfan Shahid. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

nitesh estates limited

hello, I have refurnished the nitesh estates limited wiki article that is completely based upon facts. I would like to post it on wikipedia so please allow me to do so? If still it looks like promotional then please modify it. As per my knowledge i have used reliable sources in it and hence want it to be publish online on wikipedia. So, now Can I post it on wiki? -182.68.169.29 (talk) 12:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. You have been told many times that articles deleted after discussions like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitesh Estates Limited will not be restored by request here. You should first approach the adminstrator who closed that discussion, user Sarahj2107 (talk); then, if you are not satisfied, apply at WP:Deletion review.
It is a waste of time telling you the same thing again and again; any further requests to this page for Nitesh Estates will simply be deleted without reply, JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Marc Potts

Marc Potts is a Notable British illustrator. I contest this deletion under issues of 'Notablity & self promotion', which it is most definately NOT. Marc Potts link to Jaq D Hawkins is solely as the illustrator of a few of her books. Below I have pasted the reasoning for the deletion. The advice of Wikipedia is to "contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below", in this case 'Secret'. On attempting to do this I was directed to a page informing me the 'deleter' is no longer active on Wikipedia. Reason for deletion given which I contest: (Expired PROD, concern was: notability, self-promotion, vast majority of references are by the same author as article title, links to previously deleted Jaq D Hawkins article for self-promotion) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magpie bunny (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

@Magpie bunny:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Abcmaxx (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Wikipedia's WP:Notability test for inclusion looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also WP:Notability (summary) and WP:ARTIST. Most of the existing references, where they mention him at all, simply link to examples of his work. JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Jay Hooley

I, Abhi1214, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abhi1214 (talk) 12:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the heads up. I have restored the page, as it seems clear now that Abhi1214 was responding to the bot message that the article was G13 eligible and thus contested the deletion incorrectly (should have edited the page instead). Abhi1214, please edit the article to address the issues raised in the previous AfC reviews and resubmit it. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_DeLoach_Parkway

Doing a paper and this article could be helpful -104.160.58.27 (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Drivespark

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 103.16.200.107 (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

user:ozykiss

I have years of information on my page. G11 ? I don't think that SPAM is ANY reason for speedy deletion of my page. I don't consider that there was ANY SPAM on the page at all.In any case I want to correct what you think is wrong with it. Why delete without discussion ? Unless my page was hijacked. I'd like you to review or at least send me the content that you deleted. -Ozykiss (talk) 01:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)§Ozykiss (talk) 01:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Ozykiss:, I have emailed you a copy of your page. While a G11 deletion was probably incorrect, a U5 deletion would be perfectly appropriate. Wikipedia is not a free web host, which appears to be the way the userpage was being used. If you disagree, you can ask the deleting admin (JodyB) to restore it or ask for a deletion review. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I think that they figured it was a G11 since it looked like it was somewhat being used as a place to post a CV/resume (WP:NOTLINKEDIN) as well as several press releases. @Ozykiss:, press releases are typically written to promote something and they will almost always include WP:BUZZWORDS/WP:PEACOCK terms, which come across as promotional to many editors. Another thing to be careful of is that cut/pasting the press releases will be seen as a potential copyright violation per WP:COPYVIO. Unless you hold the copyrights to the content and file a ticket through WP:ORTS giving permission, you should not post content "as is" to the page. (However even if permission is granted it would still need to be re-written since the press releases were pretty promotional.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Also be careful about saying "my page" since the ownership of a user page is somewhat wonky. While people have more freedom to post on their userpages, the userpages should only contain information about the editor as it pertains to how they will be editing Wikipedia. It's not a profile page like you would see in a database like CrunchBase or LinkedIn, so while it is yours in that you can edit it with some information, it's not yours in that you can use it like you would LinkedIn or other social media/marketing/database sites. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

I think the thing that upset me most was that it had been edited by several people during the years. and then someone just deleted it. lock stock and barrel with no discussion at all.Ozykiss (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Ozykiss Well... the page's longevity or amount of editors doesn't really mean that it's still appropriate for Wikipedia. I see that you've reposted the content and I've deleted it for the above reasons. I'd like to ask that you not restore the content as it was previously posted. If you want to include information about yourself, please follow the guidelines at WP:UPYES. What you've posted there was really, really not appropriate for Wikipedia and that's it was initially deleted, not including the time in 2010 where someone blanked the page for the same reasons. If content on a user page violates one or more of the guidelines then it should not be on Wikipedia. Do not post things like press releases (for the above stated reasons) and try to avoid writing using promotional terms. Some information about things that you're interested in are fine, as are brief comments about things that you may have a conflict of interest about, but do not write out a lengthy autobiography about yourself and your work history. Blog type information and posts should not be on Wikipedia at all, although you could probably include a link to a blog or personal website where you post these things. You can try seeing if you pass notability guidelines, but the userspace shouldn't be used as a defacto article. If you really want the content restored, please go through deletion review to request it. It's unlikely that JodyB will restore it as it was originally posted and I don't think that ThaddeusB sent you the copy of the article history with the intent for you to just repost the content. I think (if I can put words in his mouth) he was probably hoping that you would re-write it to fit userpage guidelines or maybe see if you could write a draft article (if you pass notability guidelines). If you continue to restore the content odds are high that it'll probably get deleted again and it'll kind of raise the odds that you may get temporarily blocked for spam since you haven't really made a huge-huge amount of edits to where there would be a bit more leeway with your userpage. Other than working on a draft article and creating First flush device, you really haven't edited much on here so it makes the promotional/NOTWEBHOST userspace page stand out as a violation of userpage protocol even more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Ozykiss:, I emailed you the text because you might want to use it elsewhere, not so you could restore it on Wikipedia. The text is not appropriate for Wikipedia - do not restore it again. If you are looking for a place to host it try, this list of free webhosts. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:56, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

K&M ABOGADOS, S.A.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jorge.kawas (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Please delete all records of the page K&M ABOGADOS, S.A. from wikipedia and return all materials inserted. kind regards.

The page is already deleted; search engine caches take a while to update, so if it is still showing up on a search engine, take it up with the search engine.
As for returning the text of the page, do you have email enabled on this account? If so, an admin can email you the text of the page as it stood at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
@Jorge.kawas: - to enable email, click on the preferences link on the top right of your screen. Then reply here if you did indeed want the contents emailed to you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hip Abduction

To Completely Edit my Article in support of Wikipedia Policies and then click the "Save page" button below -Hip Abduction (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 20:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
    Hip Abduction (talk · contribs), the band may well meet our inclusion criteria and I'm sure RHaworth will be happy to restore the page to draft space/user space so you can work on it. However, first you should read our policies regarding a conflict of interest and seriously reconsider writing the article if you are a member of the band or represent it in an official capacity. Additionally, you'll need to register a new user name (see notice I left on your talk page for instructions) since your current one implies group ownership, which is not allowed. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

KUVC tech was having already a Article Previous To two spedy deletion

dear sir, KUVC tech got a tag Speedy deletion Two times Because of my changes , First changes makes this article as advertisment and second (now you taged this Under section 47. While this page was already on Wiki . One more thing , I tried to create one new article and second times i edited a running article both times company comes under section 47 so what is the standard and how can we check for a right article to be created on wiki -Ankit Tiwari (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done It was actually deleted under criterion A7 see WP:CSD#A7. There was no claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Busan Brothers Bokjiwon Incident (부산 형제복지원 사건)

I, Tofoo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tofoo (talk) 08:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

iNext LTD is Limited

DEAR Wikipedia Admins you should undelete iNext, LTD caus not only is this my First page but iNex LTS is a bramd new company "Save page" button below -Techinfosource (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7 speedy deletions will not be restored here; please see WP:Notability (organizations and companies). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
@Techinfosource:   Not done – this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Since this is a brand new company, it is unlikely that there is yet enough independent comment about it to make an article. Wikipedia is not here to help announce "up and coming" companies. If you are connected with the company, please read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, JohnCD (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_181&oldid=1138663864"