S.tollyfield

Ahem

"This is now the 4th user I've had pointing out about the change of signature. Frankly as far as I am concerned this is over the top. I get it. Was not the first comment not enough? ... point scoring is the name of the game and one rooky mistake has led to a constant stream of oh so polite accusations and innuendo." Come off it. I didn't count how many people told you--but if I'm number four, why did there have to be so many? This is neither an accusation, polite or impolite, or "innuendo" (?): you need to have a signature that complies with the guidelines. It's easy. See WP:SIGLINK. Drmies (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I really, really, really did not want to respond further but you just cannot let it lie. By editing my last comment you have misrepresented what I have said. By editing out the references to Hijiri 88 you have made it appear that my comments were solely about you and then defend yourself on this basis. You are the referee. I expected better. Innuendo? Have you read your own talk page? I am apparently part of a wider conspiracy against Hijiri 88. "Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it in for me." You say you cannot understand how he keeps getting into these scrapes. Really? He starts a fight: "I am asking you politely..." and then when he encounters the slightest resistance goes crying to teacher. Classic bully. I do not know how you can stand this on a day to day basis. I have no intention of editing on Wikipedia for the foreseeable future because I cannot. So please, please, leave me alone...TotallydisillusionedwithWikipeia (talk) 07:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, S.tollyfield. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)