World Anti-Doping Agency
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA; French: Agence mondiale antidopage, AMA) is a foundation initiated by the International Olympic Committee based in Canada to promote, coordinate, and monitor the fight against drugs in sports. The agency's key activities include scientific research, education, development of anti-doping capacities, and monitoring of the World Anti-Doping Code, whose provisions are enforced by the UNESCO International Convention Against Doping in Sport. The aims of the Council of Europe Anti-Doping Convention and the United States Anti-Doping Agency are also closely aligned with those of WADA.
Agence mondial antidopage
|Formation||10 November 1999|
|Purpose||Anti-doping in sport|
|Headquarters||Montreal, Quebec, Canada|
|Affiliations||International Olympic Committee|
The World Anti-Doping Agency is a foundation created through a collective initiative led by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). It was set up on 10 November 1999 in Lausanne, Switzerland, as a result of what was called the "Declaration of Lausanne", to promote, coordinate and monitor the fight against drugs in sports. Since 2002, the organization's headquarters have been located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The Lausanne office became the regional office for Europe. Other regional offices have been established in Africa, Asia/Oceania and Latin America. WADA is responsible for the World Anti-Doping Code, adopted by more than 650 sports organizations, including international sports federations, national anti-doping organizations, the IOC, and the International Paralympic Committee. As of 2020[update], its president is Witold Banka.
Initially funded by the International Olympic Committee, WADA receives half of its budgetary requirements from them, with the other half coming from various national governments. Its governing bodies are also composed in equal parts by representatives from the sporting movement (including athletes) and governments of the world. The Agency's key activities include scientific research, education, development of anti-doping capacities, and monitoring of the World Anti-Doping Code.
The highest decision-making authority in WADA is the 38-member foundation board, which is comprised equally of IOC representatives and representatives of national governments. The Foundation Board appoints the agency's president. Most day-to-day management is delegated to a 12-member executive committee, membership of which is also split equally between the IOC and governments. There also exist several sub-committees with narrower remits, including a Finance and Administration Committee and an Athlete Committee peopled by athletes.
WADA is an international organisation. It delegates work in individual countries to Regional and National Anti-Doping Organizations (RADOs and NADOs) and mandates that these organisations are compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code. WADA also accredits around 30 laboratories to perform the required scientific analysis for doping control.
|Members||Jiří Kejval||Czech Republic|
|Ingmar De Vos||Belgium|
|Amira El Fadil||Sudan|
World Anti-Doping CodeEdit
The World Anti-Doping Code is a document published by WADA that approximately 700 sports organizations across the world are signatories to. The code "harmonizes anti-doping policies, rules, and regulations within sport organizations and among public authorities" for the purpose of "protect[ing] the athletes' fundamental right to participate in doping-free sport". The code is supplemented by eight international published by WADA covering the topics of prohibited substances, testing and investigations, laboratories, Therapeutic Use Exemptions, protection of privacy and personal information, code compliance by signatories, education, and results management. The most recent version of the code took effect on 1 January 2021.
In 2004, the World Anti-Doping Code was implemented by sports organizations prior to the Olympic Games in Athens, Greece. In November 2007, more than 600 sports organizations (international sports federations, national anti-doping organizations, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, and a number of professional leagues in various countries of the world) unanimously adopted a revised Code at the Third World Conference on Doping in Sport, to take effect on 1 January 2009.
In 2013, further amendments to the Code were approved, doubling the sanction for a first offence where intentional doping is established, but allowing for more lenient sanctions for inadvertent rule violations or for athletes co-operating with anti-doping agencies. The updated code came into effect on 1 January 2015.
On 16 November 2017, WADA’s Foundation Board initiated the 2021 Code Review Process, which also involved simultaneous review of the International Standards. During this time, stakeholders had multiple opportunities to contribute and make recommendations on how to further strengthen the global anti-doping program. Following the review process, stakeholders were invited to intervene publicly on the proposed Code and Standards during the Agency's Fifth World Conference on Doping in Sport in Katowice, Poland – an opportunity which was taken up by over 70 stakeholder organizations – before the Code and the full suite of Standards were approved by the Foundation Board and Executive Committee respectively.
Council of Europe Anti-Doping ConventionEdit
The Anti-Doping Convention of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg was opened for signature on 16 December 1989 as the first multilateral legal standard in this field. It has been signed by 48 states including the Council of Europe and non-member states Australia, Belarus, Canada and Tunisia. The Convention is open for signature by other non-European states. It does not claim to create a universal model of anti-doping, but sets a certain number of common standards and regulations requiring parties to adopt legislative, financial, technical, educational and other measures. In this sense the Convention strives for the same general aims as WADA, without being directly linked to it.
The main objective of the Convention is to promote the national and international harmonization of the measures to be taken against doping. Furthermore, the Convention describes the mission of the monitoring group set up in order to monitor its implementation and periodically re-examine the list of prohibited substances and methods which can be found in an annex to the main text. An additional protocol to the Convention entered into force on 1 April 2004 with the aim of ensuring the mutual recognition of anti-doping controls and of reinforcing the implementation of the Convention using a binding control system.
UNESCO International Convention Against Doping in SportEdit
Given that many governments cannot be legally bound by a non-governmental document such as the World Anti-Doping Code, they are implementing it by individually ratifying the UNESCO International Convention against Doping in Sport, the first global international treaty against doping in sport, which was unanimously adopted by 191 governments at the UNESCO General Conference in October 2005 and came into force in February 2007. As of April 2020, 189 states had ratified the Convention, setting a UNESCO record in terms of speed.
The UNESCO Convention is a practical and legally binding tool enabling governments to align domestic policy with the World Anti-Doping Code, thus harmonizing the rules governing anti-doping in sport. It formalizes governments' commitment to the fight against doping in sport, including by facilitating doping controls and supporting national testing programs; encouraging the establishment of "best practice" in the labelling, marketing, and distribution of products that might contain prohibited substances; withholding financial support from those who engage in or support doping; taking measures against manufacturing and trafficking; encouraging the establishment of codes of conduct for professions relating to sport and anti-doping; and funding education and research.
Statistical validity of testsEdit
Professor Donald A. Berry has argued that the closed systems used by anti-doping agencies do not allow statistical validation of the tests. This argument was seconded by an accompanying editorial in the journal Nature (7 August 2008). The anti-doping community and scientists familiar with anti-doping work rejected these arguments. On 30 October 2008, Nature (Vol 455) published a letter to the editor from WADA countering Berry's article. However, there has been at least one case where the development of statistical decision limit used by WADA in HGH use testing was found invalid by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Sun Yang doping controversyEdit
In 2018, Chinese swimmer Sun Yang destroyed samples taken during an anti-doping test. In justification, the Doping Control Officer (DCO) in charge of the testing mission was later criticized by Sun Yang, Chinese media, journalists, and scholars for not following the proper protocols. FINA's Doping Panel cleared Sun of wrongdoings. However, WADA appealed the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. A three-member CAS panel found Sun guilty of refusing to co-operate with sample testers and banned him from competitive swimming until February 2028. However, the CAS's decision has been criticized. On December 22, 2020, the Swiss Federal Tribunal set the CAS award aside due to the bias of the president of the panel, who previously tweeted anti-Chinese racial slurs. It was further found that another arbitrator, Romano Subiotto, has been sitting on a WADA's working group. This ban was subsequently reduced to 4 years and 3 months instead of the 8 years it was previously, meaning Yang would be able to participate in the 2024 Olympics.
The anti-doping code revised the whereabouts system in place since 2004, under which, as of 2014[update], athletes are required to select one hour per day, seven days a week to be available for no-notice drugs tests.
This was unsuccessfully challenged at law in 2009 by Sporta, the Belgian sports union, arguing that the system violated article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights; and by FIFPro, the international umbrella group of football players' unions, basing its case on data protection and employment law.
A significant number of sports organizations, governments, athletes, and other individuals and organizations have expressed support for the "whereabouts" requirements. The International Association of Athletics Federations and UK Sport are two of the most vocal supporters of this rule. Both FIFA and UEFA have criticized the system, citing privacy concerns, as has the BCCI.
WADA has published a Q&A explaining the rationale for the change.
National Football LeagueEdit
It was revealed in May 2011 that the American National Football League (NFL), which had previously resisted more stringent drug testing, may allow WADA to conduct its drug tests instead of doing it in-house. This could lead the way to testing for HGH, which had previously been without testing in professional American football. However, as of September 2013[update], cooperation was stalemated because "blood-testing for human growth hormone in the NFL had been delayed by the NFL's players union, who had tried 'every possible way to avoid testing'". As American football players do not participate in international sporting events, that issue is not a top priority for WADA.
In August 2016, the World Anti-Doping Agency reported the receipt of phishing emails sent to users of its database claiming to be official WADA communications requesting their login details. After reviewing the two domains provided by WADA, it was found that the websites' registration and hosting information were consistent with the Russian hacking group Fancy Bear. According to WADA, some of the data the hackers released had been forged.
Due to evidence of widespread doping by Russian athletes, WADA recommended that Russian athletes be barred from participating in the 2016 Rio Olympics and Paralympics. Analysts said they believed the hack was in part an act of retaliation against whistleblowing Russian athlete Yuliya Stepanova, whose personal information was released in the breach. In August 2016, WADA revealed that their systems had been breached, explaining that hackers from Fancy Bear had used an IOC-created account to gain access to their Anti-doping Administration and Management System (ADAMS) database. The hackers then used the website fancybear.net to leak what they said were the Olympic drug testing files of several athletes who had received therapeutic use exemptions, including gymnast Simone Biles, tennis players Venus and Serena Williams and basketball player Elena Delle Donne. The hackers honed in on athletes who had been granted exemptions by WADA for various reasons. Subsequent leaks included athletes from many other countries.
In 2016, Professor Richard McLaren, an independent investigator working on behalf of WADA published a second part of his report (first part was published in July 2016) showing that more than 1,000 Russians athletes in over 30 sports were involved in or benefited from state-sponsored doping between 2011 and 2015. As a result of the report, many Russian athletes were barred from participating in the 2018 winter Olympics. Despite widely accepted evidence, in 2018 WADA lifted its ban on Russian athletes. The reinstatement was strongly criticized by, among others, Russian whistle blower Grigory Rodchenkov, and his lawyer, James Walden.
List of presidentsEdit
|Nr||Dates||Name||Country of origin|
|1||10 November 1999 – 31 December 2007||Dick Pound||Canada|
|2||1 January 2008 – 31 December 2013||John Fahey||Australia|
|3||1 January 2014 – 31 December 2019||Craig Reedie||United Kingdom|
|4||1 January 2020 – present||Witold Bańka||Poland|
- "Lausanne Declaration on Doping in Sport". sportunterricht.de. 4 February 1999.
- Executive Committee Archived 13 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine at WADA official website, June 2014
- Hunt, Thomas M. (15 January 2011). Drug Games: The International Olympic Committee and the Politics of Doping, 1960–2008. University of Texas Press. ISBN 9780292739574.
- "Governance". wada-ama.org. WADA. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- "Briton Sir Craig Reedie elected World Anti-Doping Agency President". UK Anti-Doping. 15 November 2013. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- "Finance and Administration Committee". wada-ama.org. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- "Athlete Committee". wada-ama.gov. WADA. 15 November 2013. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- "National Anti-Doping Organizations (NADO)". World Anti-Doping Agency. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- "Regional Anti-Doping Organizations (RADO)". World Anti-Doping Agency.
- "Accredited and approved laboratories". wada-ama.org. WADA. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- World Anti-Doping Agency: 2009 World Anti-Doping Code Archived 24 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- "The Code". wada-ama.org. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
- "World Anti-Doping Code" (PDF). World Anti-Doping Agency. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
- "International Standards". wada-ama.org. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
- "2021 Code Review". World Anti-Doping Agency. 6 December 2017. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
- Zorea, Aharon (2014). Steroids (Health and Medical Issues Today). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp. 77–83. ISBN 978-1440802997.
- "Drugs in sport: Wada doubles doping ban in new code". BBC Sport. 15 November 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
- 2015 World Anti-Doping Code - Final Draft Archived 1 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine WADA. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
- Berry DA (August 2008). "The science of doping". Nature. 454 (7205): 692–3. Bibcode:2008Natur.454..692B. doi:10.1038/454692a. PMID 18685682. S2CID 205040220. Full access is restricted to subscribers
- "A level playing field?". Nature. 454 (7205): 667. August 2008. Bibcode:2008Natur.454Q.667.. doi:10.1038/454667a. PMID 18685647. S2CID 158157049.
- Ljungqvist, Arne; Horta, Luis; Wadler, Gary (2008). "Doping: World agency sets standards to promote fair play". Nature. 455 (7217): 1176. Bibcode:2008Natur.455.1176L. doi:10.1038/4551176a. PMID 18971999.
- "Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2566. Andrus Veerpalu v. International Ski Federation (ISF)" (PDF). Bulletin TAS - CAS Bulletin. Court of Arbitration for Sport. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
- "The Sun Yang Case, Explained - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com.
- "Australia's Sunday Telegraph Publishes Sun Yang FINA Doping Panel Report In Full, English - & Mandarin". 13 July 2019.
- Group, Dorier (14 November 2019). "CAS 2019/A/6148 - Part 1" – via Vimeo.
- "Chinese swimmer Sun Yang banned for eight years for breaking anti-doping rules". ABC News. 28 February 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
- Lord, Craig (28 February 2020). "Sun Yang Vs WADA Verdict: Damning Eight-Year Ends Career Of Chinese Controversy". Swimming World Magazine. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
- "Should changes follow Sun Yang's eight year ban?". 12 June 2020.
- Panja, Tariq (23 December 2020). "Chinese Swimmer's Doping Ban is Lifted After Accusation of Racism". The New York Times.
- "Working Group on the Review of WADA Governance Reforms". 26 November 2020.
- "Sun Yang's Ban Reduced to Four Years & 3 Months, Still Out of Tokyo Olympics". 22 June 2021.
- "Athletes air issues over testing". BBC News. 16 February 2009.
- Slater, Matt (22 January 2009). "Legal threat to anti-doping code". BBC News.
- "IAAF: IAAF opinion on "new" whereabouts requirements- News - iaaf.org".
- Whereabouts at UK Anti-Doping, 2014
- "WordPress.com". Archived from the original on 23 December 2014.
- Hindu.com "BCCI opposes doping clause". The Hindu. 3 August 2009. Archived from the original on 4 August 2009.
- "What we do". 14 November 2013.
- WADA to test NFL Archived 15 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- Ingle, Sean "NFL faces battle with Wada over transparency of drug-testing" The Guardian, 28 September 2013
- Hyacinth Mascarenhas (23 August 2016). "Russian hackers 'Fancy Bear' likely breached Olympic drug-testing agency and DNC, experts say". International Business Times. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
- "What we know about Fancy Bears hack team". BBC News. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
- Gallagher, Sean (6 October 2016). "Researchers find fake data in Olympic anti-doping, Guccifer 2.0 Clinton dumps". Ars Technica. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
- Thielman, Sam (22 August 2016). "Same Russian hackers likely breached Olympic drug-testing agency and DNC". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
- Meyer, Josh (14 September 2016). "Russian hackers post alleged medical files of Simone Biles, Serena Williams". NBC News.
- "American Athletes Caught Doping". Fancybear.net. 13 September 2016. Archived from the original on 24 December 2017. Retrieved 23 December 2017.
- "McLaren Independent Investigation Report - Part I". World Anti-Doping Agency. 18 July 2016.
- "McLaren Independent Investigation Report - Part II". World Anti-Doping Agency. 9 December 2016.
- Russian state doped more than 1,000 athletes and corrupted London 2012 9 December 2016
- "Report Shows Vast Reach of Russian Doping: 1,000 Athletes, 30 Sports". Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- "Russia Is Barred From Winter Olympics. Russia Is Sending 169 Athletes to Winter Olympics". Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- Pells, Eddie. "Despite protests, Russia's anti-doping agency reinstated". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- "Whistleblower warns WADA of 'catastrophe' if Russia ban eased". France 24. 19 September 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- Ingle, Sean (20 September 2018). "Wada lifts Russia's three-year doping suspension and faces its biggest crisis". the Guardian. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- Official website
- "World Anti-Doping Code: International Standard Prohibited List" (PDF). World Anti-Doping Agency. January 2018.
- World Anti-Doping Agency criticises 'extremist' NFL players over HGH, The Guardian/AP, 28 March 2013
- WADA publishes Independent McLaren Investigations Report